Wianxx Impex Pvt. Ltd vs Srei Equipment Finance Ltd
- CitationCompany Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 446 of 2018
Ratio decidendi
The rule this decision rests on
Where an application under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 is pending before the Adjudicating Authority, the Corporate Debtor must be afforded an opportunity to file a reply before the Adjudicating Authority passes an order of admission or rejection; an order that prohibits the Corporate Debtor from filing any objection, without first affording that opportunity, is a violation of the principles of natural justice and is liable to be set aside.
Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.
Judgment
As delivered
Wianxx Impex Pvt. Ltd. ...Appellant
Versus
Srei Equipment Finance Ltd. ...Respondent
Present:
For Appellant : Mr. Muneesh Malhotra, Mr. Rajat Bhardwaj, Ms. Prerna Chaturvedi, Ms. Manpreet Bhatia, Advocates
For 1st Respondent: Mr. Arijit Mazumdar, Mr. Akshay Chandna and Mr. Shambo Nandy, Advocates
ORDER
10.08.2018 The respondent - 'Srei Equipment Finance Limited' filed an
application under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016
(hereinafter referred to as the "I&B Code') for initiation of 'Corporate Insolvency
Resolution Process' against the appellant - 'Wianxx Impex Pvt. Ltd. Notice has
been issued on the appellant whereinafter the case has not been admitted by the
impugned order dated 30th July, 2018. The Adjudicating Authority (National
Company Law Tribunal), Principal Bench passed the following order:
"In terms of order dated 11.07.2018 an
additional affidavit and the certificate
admissible under evidence was required to
be filed. Ld. Counsel for the petitioner 2
states that the same is ready and shall be
filed in the registry today itself with a copy
in advance to the counsel opposite.
List for arguments on 10.08.2018.
No objections are required to file."
2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant submits that by the
last line of the impugned order, the Corporate Debtor has been prohibited from
filing any objection which is in violation of the principle of natural justice.
3. Mr. Arijit Mazumdar, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the
respondent submitted that an affidavit of compliance was asked by the
respondent herein to bring on record certain evidence. For the said reason, it
was ordered no objections is required to be filed.
4. While we accept that the appellant cannot raise any objection with regard
to the evidence if filed by the respondent (Financial Creditor), but we are of the
opinion that before giving hearing to the appellant (Corporate Debtor),
Adjudicating Authority should have given an opportunity to file a reply in view
of the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in "Innoventive Industries Ltd. Vs.
ICICI Bank and Ors., - (2018) 1 SCC 407". In the said judgment, Hon'ble
Supreme Court in paragraph 28 etc., has allowed to the 'Corporate Debtor' to
raise the objection.
5. The Adjudicating Authority having failed to notice the aforesaid provision,
we set aside the impugned order. If any reply is filed by the appellant within ten
days, the Adjudicating Authority will take into consideration the same before
passing order of admission or rejection of the application under Section 7 of the
Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 446 of 2018 3
I&B Code. As we have granted ten days' time to the appellant to file reply, we
may also grant one week's time to the respondent (Financial Creditor) to file
rejoinder.
6. The appeal stands disposed of with the aforesaid observations.
[Justice S.J. Mukhopadhaya] Chairperson
[ Justice Bansi Lal Bhat ] Member (Judicial)
/ns/gc/
Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 446 of 2018
This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.
Research this judgment with Miss Lucy
Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.
Try Miss Lucy free