West Bengal Essential Commodities ... vs Bank Of Maharashtra
- CitationCompany Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 90 of 2017
Ratio decidendi
The rule this decision rests on
The Appellate Tribunal, in refusing to interfere with an order admitting a Section 7 application, held that the adjudicating authority's admission of an application that is complete and free of defect, and where no infirmity is shown in the impugned order, provides no basis for appellate interference; and that the financial creditor's application under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, having been found complete, was properly admitted.
Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.
Judgment
As delivered
NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 90 of 2017 (Under Section 61 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 against order dated 29.05.2017 passed by National Company Law Tribunal, Principal Bench in C.P.(IB) No.240/KB of 2017)
IN THE MATTER OF: West Bengal Essential Commodities Supply Corporation Ltd. ...Appellant
Versus
Bank of Maharashtra ...Respondent
Present: For Appellant: - Shri Subhasish Bhowrnick, Advocate
ORDER
13.07.20 17 This Appeal has been preferred by the appellant - West Bengal
Essential Commodities Supply Corporation Ltd. against order dated 29th May, 2017
passed by Adjudicating Authority (National Company Law Tribunal) Kolkata Bench
in C.P. (IB) No.240/KB/20 17, whereby the application preferred by respondent-
Financial Creditor under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016
(hereinafter referred to as "I&B Code, 2016") has been admitted, declaration of
moratorium and public announcement order has been ordered and Interim
Resolution Professional (IRP) has been, appointed for ascertaining the particulars
of creditors and convening a Committee of Creditors for appointment of Resolution
Professional and for evolving a resolution plan.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant submitted that the
appellant is a State Government undertaking and dealing with poor farmers. It is
supplying essential commodities to the farmers and settlement talks are going on
between the appellant and the Financial Creditors. However, such ground cannot
be accepted to 'interfere with the impugned order dated 2911, May, 2017 passed by learned Adjudicating Authority Kolkata Bench under Section 7 of 'I & B Code' 20 16
The learned Adjudicating Authority having noticed that the application preferred by
the respondent Financial Creditor is complete and in absence of any defect,
admitted the application. -
In absence of any infirmity, we are not inclined to interfere with the impugned
order.
However, we make it clear that after ascertaining the particulars of the
creditors, pursuant to public announcement made in the newspaper, if the
appellants intends to settle the dispute with the respondents by paying Rs.27.93/-
crores (the amount as owned by the creditors) and if rest of the creditors are also
satisfied by the appellant, in such case, it will be open, to the. appellant to request
the learned Adjudicating Authority, Kolkata Bench to close the Resolution Process
having satisfied all the creditors. In such case, the Adjudicating Authority will
consider the request and will pass appropriate order un-influenced by the
impugned order dated 29th May, 2017 and the order passed by this Appellate
Tribunal.
The Appeal stands disposed of with the aforesaid observation
[Justice S.J. Mukhopadhaya] Chairperson
[Balvinder Singh] Member (Technical)
/aks/
This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.
Research this judgment with Miss Lucy
Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.
Try Miss Lucy free