Wakar vs State Of U.P.
- Neutral2026:AHC:104426
Ratio decidendi
The rule this decision rests on
Where an accused is involved in organized crime under the Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act and is already on bail in related cases, bail may be granted during the pendency of trial upon the accused furnishing a personal bond with sureties, subject to conditions whose breach shall constitute grounds for cancellation of bail. Any observations made by the court in granting bail are limited to the determination of the bail application itself and shall not constitute an expression on the merits of the case, leaving the trial court free to arrive at independent conclusions on the evidence unaffected by the bail order.
Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.
Judgment
As delivered
1. Heard Sri Sunil Kumar Saroj, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri J.P. Singh, learned AGA for the State-respondents and perused the record.
2. The present bail application under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, has been filed on behalf of applicant with a prayer to release him on bail in Case Crime No. 852 of 2025, under Section 2/3 of U.P. Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act, registered at P.S. Lisarigate, District Meerut, during pendency of the trial.
3. It has been argued by the learned counsel for the applicant that applicant is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this case and he has been languishing in jail since 16.6.2025. It is further submitted that the applicant is on bail in solitary case shown against him in the gang chart and apart from the above, the applicant is also on bail in two other cases. It is further submitted that the applicant undertakes that he will not misuse the liberty, if granted. It has also been pointed out that in the wake of heavy pendency of cases in the Court, there is no likelihood of any early conclusion of trial.
4. Per contra learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the applicant.
5. The applicant is on bail in solitary case shown against him in the gang chart and apart from the above, the applicant is also on bail in two other cases.
6. Upon considering the totality of facts, nature and the evidence reflected from record and also taking into consideration the provision of Section 19(4) of the Act and without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, I find it to be a fit case for bail. Hence, the present bail application is ALLOWED.
7. Let the applicant- Wakar involved in the aforesaid case crime be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 50,000/- with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Court concerned with the following conditions :-
(i) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat, or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.
(ii) The applicant shall not pressurize/intimidate the prosecution witnesses.
(iii) The applicant shall remain present, in person, before the trial court on the dates fixed for (i) opening of the case, (ii) framing of charge and (iii) recording of statement under Section 351 of B.N.S.S.
(iv) The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that he shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence when the witnesses are present in the trial court.
(v) The applicant shall remain present before the trial court on each date fixed, either personally or through his counsel.
8. In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail.
9. It is clarified that anything said in this order is limited to the purpose of determination of this bail application and will in no way be construed as an expression on the merits of the case. The trial court shall be absolutely free to arrive at its independent conclusions on the basis of evidence led unaffected by anything said in this order.
(Jitendra Kumar Sinha,J.)
May 6, 2026
Abhishek
This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.
Research this judgment with Miss Lucy
Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.
Try Miss Lucy free