Vodafone East Ltd., Kolkata vs Assessee
- CitationITA No. 243/Kol/2014)
Ratio decidendi
The rule this decision rests on
The Tribunal may extend an interim stay of demand pending disposal of the appeal where there is no change in the facts and circumstances since the stay was originally granted and the delay in disposing of the appeal is not attributable to the assessee.
Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.
Judgment
As delivered
1 S.P. No. 07/Kol/2015 (arising out of S.P. No. 77/Kol/2014 & S.P. No. 27/Kol/2014) (in ITA No. 243/Kol/2014) Assessment Year : 2010-2011
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, KOLKATA 'A' BENCH, KOLKATA
Before Shri Sham im Ya hya, Accountant Member and Shri Ge orge M atha n, Judicial Me mber
S.P. No. 07/Kol/2015 (arising out of S.P. No. 77/Kol/2014 & 27/Kol/2014) (arising out of I.T.A. No. 243/Kol/2014) Assess ment year : 2010 -2 01 1
Vod a fone Ea st Limited ,........................................ .............P etitioner (For me rly kn own a s Vod a fone E ssa r Ea st Limited ) 11, Dr. U.N. Bhra h ma c ha ri Stre et, Kol ka ta -700 017 [PA N :AA ACU 3796 J]
-Vs.- Joint Co mmissi oner of Income Ta x,.................................Resp ond e nt Ra ng e-7, Kolka ta
Appeara nces by : S/ Shri Vibrooti Malhotra and Piyush Sin gh , Advocate, for th e P etitioner Sh ri Niloy Baran So m, JCIT, for th e Department
Dat e of concluding t he hearin g : Feb ruary 11, 2015 Dat e of pr onouncing th e order : Feb ruary 11, 2015
O R D E R
Per Shri George Mathan, Judicial Member :
This St ay Petition has been filed by the assessee in asses see's app eal in ITA No. 243/Ko l/2014.
2. Sh ri Vib rooti Malhotra, Advocat e and Shri Piyush Sin gh, Advocate, rep resented on behalf of the as ses see an d Sh ri Niloy Baran Som, JCIT, D.R., represented on behalf of th e R ev en ue.
3. The as ses see in the St ay Petition has reque sted for ext ension of stay as th e o rig inal st ay had been grant ed up to 3 1.01.2015 and the appeal of the ass ese e is now posted for heari ng on 1 9.02.2015. Ld. Cou nsel on 2 S.P. No. 07/Kol/2015 (arising out of S.P. No. 77/Kol/2014 & S.P. No. 27/Kol/2014) (in ITA No. 243/Kol/2014) Assessment Year : 2010-2011
beh alf of th e a ss ess ee su bmit s that th ere i s no chan ge in the fact s and circu mstanc es fro m the time wh en the stay was granted. It was the prayer that th e stay may be extended til l the disposal of the app eal by the Trib unal.
4. In reply, ld. D.R. v ehemently opposed to the exten sion of stay.
5. We have co nsid ered th e rival submissio ns. As th ere is no cha nge in the facts an d ci rcu mst anc es f rom the t ime an d stay had been ori gin ally grant ed by the Tribun al vide o rder dat ed 08.08.2014 and also co nsiderin g the fa ct that a s the reason fo r d elay in the dispo sal of the asses see's app eal is not attributable to the assessee, the St ay petition filed by the as se sse e stand s allo wed and the stay stands ext ended till 2 n d Ap ril, 2015.
6. In the result, Stay Petition fil ed by the asses see st and s allowed.
Ord e r p ronounced in the open Cou rt on 11 t h day of F ebruary, 20 15.
Sd /- Sd /- Shamim Yahya George Mathan (A cco untant Member) ( Jud icial Me mber)
Kolkata, th e 11 t h day of Feb ruary , 2015 Co pies to : (1) Voda fone Ea st Limited , (For me rly kn own a s Vod a fone E ssa r Ea st Limited ) 11, Dr. U.N. Bhra h ma c ha ri Stre et, Kol ka ta -700 017
(2) Joint Co mmissi oner of Income Ta x, Ra ng e-7, Kolka ta (3) CIT (4) CIT(A) (5) The Depar tmental R epr es entative (6) Guard Fil e By order et c
Assistant Registrar Income Tax App ellate Tribunal Kolkata Ben ch es, Kolkata Laha/Sr. P.S.
This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.
Research this judgment with Miss Lucy
Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.
Try Miss Lucy free