Vivek Saran Vs. Sebi & Ors. vs Sebi
- CitationAppeal No. 613 of 2023
Ratio decidendi
The rule this decision rests on
A complaint that concerns a private dispute between a shareholder and a company, and the transferee of shares, which can only be resolved in a suit, does not warrant action by the regulator where no provision of the securities laws is shown to have been violated; in such a case the regulator is justified in disposing of the complaint on the SCORES platform.
Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.
Judgment
As delivered
Date of Decision: 17.07.2023
Misc. Application No. 634 of 2023 And Appeal No. 613 of 2023
Vivek Saran Chitvan, 6/25, E-4 Parvati Bagla Road, Kanpur- 208 001 ...Appellant
Versus
1.
Securities and Exchange Board of India, SEBI Bhavan, Plot No. C-4A, G-Block, Bandra-Kurla Complex, Bandra (East), Mumbai- 400 051
2. ION Exchange (India) Ltd.
Ion House, Dr. E. Moses Road, Mahalaxmi, Mumbai- 400 011 (India)
3. M/s TSR Consultants Private Limited C-101, 1st Floor, 247 Park, L.B.S. Marg Vikhroli (West), Mumbai- 400 083
4. IEI Shareholding (Cultural Activities)- 1994 Trust No. 1, Ion House, Dr. E. Moses Road, Mahalaxmi, Mumbai- 400 011 (India) ...Respondents
Mr. Prashant Trivedi, Advocate for the Appellant.
Mr. Sumit Rai, Advocate with Mr. Manish Chhangani, Ms. Samreen Fatima, Mr. Sumit Yadav and Mr. Abhay Chauhan, Advocates i/b The Law Point for Respondent-SEBI. 2
CORAM: Justice Tarun Agarwala, Presiding Officer Ms. Meera Swarup, Technical Member
Per: Justice Tarun Agarwala, Presiding Officer (Oral)
1. The present appeal has been filed against the
communication dated April 06, 2023 issued by the respondents
disposing of the complaint on the SCORES platform. There is
an application seeking exemption to file the certified copy of the
impugned order. The exemption application is allowed.
2. The facts leading to the filing of the present appeal is, that
the appellant contends that he had bought shares of ION
Exchange (India) Limited. He applied for conversion of 122
physical shares into dematerialized shares before Respondent
No. 1. The appellant was informed by the Company that these
122 shares are already existing in the name of Respondent No. 4
and, therefore, declined to dematerialize the shares. The
appellant thereafter raised a complaint before the Stock
Exchange and thereafter to the Securities and Exchange Board
of India on the SCORES platform. The said complaint was
disposed off by the impugned order.
3. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties, we are of
the opinion that the dispute is a private dispute between the 3
appellant and the Company Respondent No. 2 and the entity to
whom the shares have been transferred, namely, Respondent
No. 4. This is a private dispute which can only be resolved in a
suit. Since no SEBI laws have been violated nor have been
shown to have been violated, we are of the opinion that SEBI
was justified in disposing off the complaints on the SCORES
platform.
4. We do not find any manifest error in the impugned order.
The appeal fails and is dismissed.
5. This order will be digitally signed by the Private
Secretary on behalf of the bench and all concerned parties are
directed to act on the digitally signed copy of this order.
Certified copy of this order is also available from the Registry
on payment of usual charges.
Justice Tarun Agarwala Presiding Officer
Ms. Meera Swarup Technical Member
17.07.2023 PRERNA Digitally by PRERNA signed
PK MANISH MANISH KHARE Date: 2023.07.19 KHARE 10:47:06 +05'30'
This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.
Research this judgment with Miss Lucy
Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.
Try Miss Lucy free