Vivek Mehrotra & Anr. vs Sebi
- CitationAppeal No. 270 of 2018
Ratio decidendi
The rule this decision rests on
The appeal is premature where the adjudicating officer has not yet ruled on a request for cross-examination, since the party must first put its request and reasons to the adjudicating officer, and the Tribunal will not intervene at the hearing-notice stage before that request has been considered.
Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.
Judgment
As delivered
DATE : 01.08.2018
Appeal No. 270 of 2018
1.
Vivek Mehrotra
2. Rashi Investments
Khattri House, Tikait Rai Katalab, Lucknow 226017, Uttar Pradesh. ..... Appellants
Versus
Securities and Exchange Board of India SEBI Bhavan, C-4A, G-Block, Bandra Kurla Complex, Bandra (E), Mumbai - 400 051. ...... Respondent
Mr. Pesi Modi, Senior Advocate with Ms. Kalpana Desai, Mr. Sumit Agrawal, Mr. Mahaveer Rajguru, Advocates i/b Regstreet Law Advisors for the Appellants.
Mr. Gaurav Joshi, Senior Advocate with Mr. Nishant Upadhyay, Advocate i/b K. Ashar & Co. for the Respondent.
CORAM : Dr. C. K. G. Nair, Member
Per : Dr. C. K. G. Nair (Oral)
1. Not on board. Taken up today by the consent of the parties.
2. This appeal has been filed against the hearing notice issued by SEBI
on July 11, 2018 by which the appellants have been directed to appear
before the Adjudicating Officer of SEBI on August 1, 2018.
3. The submission of the learned Senior Counsel for the appellants Shri
P. N. Modi is that the appellants have been repeatedly writing to SEBI
seeking cross examination of certain parties; cross-examination which is
crucial to the proceedings. Since SEBI has not responded to the same,
intervention of this appellate tribunal is prayed for. 2
4. Learned Senior Counsel Shri Joshi, on the other hand, submits that
the appellants' need to make a proper case for seeking cross-examination of
parties and accused cannot be cross examined. Once a proper case is made
out the adjudicating officer would consider the same.
5. I note that the Show Cause Notice was issued in this matter by SEBI
on March 20, 2014 and after large number of correspondence in respect of
provision of documents etc. the impugned hearing notice dated July 11,
2018 has been issued. It is upto the appellants to present before the A. O.
of SEBI and make their request for cross-examination. Accordingly, I am
of the view that this is a premature application for intervention of this
appellate tribunal. However, in view of the statement made by the learned
Senior Counsel for SEBI that the adjudicating officer will consider the
request of the applicant if a proper case is made out giving detailed reasons
for the same, Appellant is directed to appear before the A.O. of SEBI.
6. Appeal is disposed of on the above terms with no order as to costs.
Sd/-
Dr. C. K. G. Nair Member 01.08.2018 Prepared & Compared by PTM
This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.
Research this judgment with Miss Lucy
Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.
Try Miss Lucy free