Miss Lucy
← All judgments

Vinod Kumar Chaddha, Jalaun vs Assessee

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal3 February 2015

Ratio decidendi

The rule this decision rests on

Where a Tribunal has disposed of an appeal ex parte on account of the assessee's non-appearance, and the assessee has shown a valid reason for that non-appearance on the date fixed, the Tribunal may recall its ex parte order in the interest of justice and restore the appeal for fresh hearing, notwithstanding that the order was framed as a decision on merits.

Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.

Judgment

As delivered

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNALLUCKNOW BENCH "B", LUCKNOWBEFORE SHRI SUNIL KUMAR YADAV, JUDICIAL MEMBERAND SHRI. A. K. GARODIA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBERM.A. No.122/LKW/2014[Arising out of ITA No.520/LKW/2014]Assessment Years:2004-05

Vinod Kumar Chaddha v. Income Tax Officer 6(1) Through L/H Prop. Banarasi Das & Sons Orai Lajpat Nagar, Konch District Jalaun PAN:AERPC2119M (Applicant) (Respondent)

Applicant by: Shri. Manoj Yadav, C.A Respondent by: Shri. P. K.Ddey, D.R. Date of hearing: 16 01 2015 Date of pronouncement: 16 01 2015

ORDER

PER SUNIL KUMAR YADAV:

This Miscellaneous Application is preferred on behalf of the assessee against the order of the Tribunal dated 13.10.2014 in ITA No.520/LKW/2014, with the submission that the Tribunal has dismissed the appeal of the assessee ex-parte on account of non-appearance on behalf of the assessee. It was further contended that the assessee had sent an application dated 1.10.2014 through fax followed by speed post for adjournment of hearing fixed on 1.10.2014. It was further contended that the adjournment application dated 1.10.2014 sent through fax by the assessee on the very day of hearing might not have received in the office of the Tribunal or through an oversight it might not have placed before the Bench. The ld. counsel for the assessee has submitted that in this view of the matter, the order of the Tribunal dated 13.10.2014 in ITA :-2-:

No.520/LKW/2014 may be recalled and the appeal may be fixed for fresh hearing.

2. The ld. D.R. has placed reliance upon the order of the Tribunal dated 13.10.2014 with the submission that since the Tribunal has decided the appeal on merit, the order cannot be recalled.

3. Having given a thoughtful consideration to the rival submissions and from a careful perusal of the order of the Tribunal vis-à-vis the Miscellaneous Application, we find that the assessee has furnished a valid reason for non-appearance on the date fixed. We, therefore, recall our order dated 13.10.2014 in ITA No.520/LKW/2014 in the interest of justice and direct the Registry to fix this appeal for hearing on 5.3.2015. Since the date of hearing has been announced in the open court, no fresh notice will be issued to the assessee.

4. In the result, Miscellaneous Application is allowed.

Order was pronounced in the open court on the date mentioned on the captioned page.

Sd/- Sd/- [A. K. GARODIA] [SUNIL KUMAR YADAV] ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER

DATED:3rd February, 2015 JJ:1601 Copy forwarded to: 1. Applicant 2. Respondent 3. CIT(A) 4. CIT 5. DR Assistant Registrar

This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.

Research this judgment with Miss Lucy

Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.

Try Miss Lucy free