Vinay Tambi, Partner vs Khandelwal Buildcon Pvt. Ltd. & Anr
- CitationCompany Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 1036 of 2019
Ratio decidendi
The rule this decision rests on
Where a Section 7 application under the I&B Code has been settled between the parties before the Committee of Creditors is constituted, the Appellate Tribunal may, in the exercise of its power under Rule 11 of the NCLAT Rules, 2016, set aside the admission order of the Adjudicating Authority and permit the financial creditor to withdraw the application, following the approach of the Supreme Court in Swiss Ribbons Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India.
Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.
Judgment
As delivered
Vinay Tambi, Partner M/s Taruchaya Colonizers LLP ...Appellant
Vs
Khandelwal Buildcon Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. ...Respondents
Present: For Appellant: Mr. Rajshekhar Rao, Ms. Ankita Chaudhry and Mr. Raghav Kacher, Advocates. For Respondents: Mr. Prakul Khurana and Mr. Ankit Sareen, Advocates for R-1. Mr. Prashant Agrawal, IRP.
ORDER
06.12.2019: 'Khandelwal Buildcon Pvt. Ltd.' (Financial Creditor) moved
application under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016
(hereinafter referred to as 'I&B Code'), pursuant to which Corporate Insolvency
Resolution Process initiated against 'Taruchaya Colonizers LLP' (Corporate
Debtor) by impugned order dated 1st October, 2019 passed by the Adjudicating
Authority (National Company Law Tribunal), Jaipur Bench (Rajasthan).
2. When the matter was taken up on 14th November, 2019, learned counsel
for the Appellant stated that the Appellant is ready to pay principal amount of
Rs.2,25,00,000/- as shown in Part IV of Form-1, which is the 'defaulted
amount' shown. Mr. Sanjay Jhawar, learned counsel appeared on behalf of the
Respondent - 'Khandelwal Buildcon Pvt. Ltd.' (Financial Creditor) submitted -2-
that the said Respondent may accept the offer provided the Appellant
withdraws the 'FIR' filed against the Financial Creditor, its Director, other
family members and Interim Resolution Professional. Learned counsel
appearing on behalf of the Appellant agreed on behalf of the Appellant to
withdraw such FIR lodged against 'Khandelwal Buildcon Pvt. Ltd.', its
Directors, other family members and the Interim Resolution Professional. It
was also informed that the Committee of Creditors has not been constituted.
3. An affidavit has been filed by the Appellant stating that the Appellant has
agreed to withdraw the FIR lodged against 'Khandelwal Buildcon Pvt. Ltd.', its
Directors, family members and Mr. Prashant Agrawal, Interim Resolution
Professional. Another affidavit has been filed on behalf of the Respondent -
'Khandelwal Buildcon Pvt. Ltd.'. It is informed that the Respondent has agreed
to settle the matter for Rs.2,25,00,000/- subject to withdrawal of the FIR No.
0586/2019 registered at PS Bhankrota, Jaipur lodged by the Appellant against
'Khandelwal Buildcon Pvt. Ltd.', its Directors, family members and Mr.
Prashant Agrawal, Interim Resolution Professional. It is also stated that the
Appellant should pay fee and cost of the Interim Resolution Professional. The
Interim Resolution Professional has been provided an advance amount of Rs.2
Lakhs by 'Khandelwal Buildcon Pvt. Ltd.' (Financial Creditor), which he should
return.
Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 1036 of 2019 -3-
4. Mr. Prashant Agrawal, Interim Resolution Professional while accepted
that the Committee of Creditors has not been constituted, agreed to return a
sum of Rs.2 Lakhs to 'Khandelwal Buildcon Pvt. Ltd.', if he is paid by the
Appellant a sum of Rs.5,38,471/-, which is the fee and cost incurred by him.
5. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Appellant hands over
Demand Draft No. 014588 dated 5th December, 2019 issued by Axis Bank,
Civil Lines, Jaipur (Rajasthan) in the name of 'Khandelwal Buildcon Pvt Ltd' for
Rs.2,25,00,000/- (Rupees Two Crore Twenty Five Lakh Only) to Mr. Prakul
Khurana, learned counsel for the Respondent - 'Khandelwal Buildcon Pvt. Ltd.'
for onward transmission to the said Respondent.
6. Learned counsel for the Appellant also handed over a post-dated cheque
No.160306 dated 20th December, 2019 issued by 'Axis Bank Ltd.', Civil Line,
Jaipur (Rajasthan) in the name of 'Mr. Prashant Agrawal' for Rs.5,38,471/-
(Rupees Five Lakh Thirty Eight Thousand Four Hundred and Seventy One
Only) signed by Mr. Vinay Tambi (Appellant) to Mr. Prashant Agrawal, Interim
Resolution Professional. The Appellant undertakes that the above cheque will
not bounce and can be encashed on or after 20th December, 2019.
Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 1036 of 2019 -4-
7. In the circumstance, while we order to keep a copy of aforesaid Demand
Draft and Post-dated Cheque in the record of this appeal, taking into
consideration the fact that the Committee of Creditors had not been
constituted by the time the matter has been settled between the parties,
following the decision of Hon'ble Supreme Court in 'Swiss Ribbons Pvt. Ltd.
& Anr. Vs. Union of India & Ors.', Writ Petition (Civil) No. 99/2018,
reported in 2019 SCC OnLine SC 73, in exercise of power conferred under
Rule 11 of NCLAT Rules, 2016, we set aside impugned order dated 1st October,
2019 passed by the Adjudicating Authority and allow 'Khandelwal Buildcon
Pvt. Ltd.' (Financial Creditor) to withdraw the application under Section 7 of the
I&B Code. The application under Section 7 stands withdrawn.
8. Mr. Prashant Agrawal, Interim Resolution Professional is directed to
return the sum of Rs.2,00,000/- to the person rom whom he received the
amount on behalf of 'Khandelwal Buildcon Pvt. Ltd.' within 15 days from the
date of encashment of cheque of Rs.5,38,471/-. He is also directed to
handover possession of assets and records of the Corporate Debtor to the
Promoter/ Board of Directors of 'Taruchaya Colonizers LLP' on receipt of the
amount of Rs.5,38,471/- The Appellant or any other person who has lodged
FIR No. 0586/2019, will move appropriate application for withdrawal/
Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 1036 of 2019 -5-
quashing of FIR before appropriate Police Station / Court of Law, which may
take into consideration the agreement reached between the parties and pass
appropriate order. The application must be moved within a period of two
weeks. The appeal is allowed with aforesaid observations and directions.
[Justice S. J. Mukhopadhaya] Chairperson
[Justice Bansi Lal Bhat] Member (Judicial)
[Justice Venugopal M.] Member (Judicial)
am/gc
Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 1036 of 2019
This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.
Research this judgment with Miss Lucy
Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.
Try Miss Lucy free