Miss Lucy
← All judgments

Vikash Gautamchand Jain Rp Of Care ... vs Bank Of India

National Company Law Appellate Tribunal8 December 2021

Ratio decidendi

The rule this decision rests on

The Appellate Tribunal declined to interfere with an interlocutory listing order fixing a hearing date for approval of a resolution plan, and disposed of the appeal with a direction that the Adjudicating Authority endeavour to decide the pending applications on the fixed date or at an early date thereafter. No general principle is laid down beyond the disposal itself.

Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.

Judgment

As delivered

NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PRINCIPAL BENCH,NEW DELHICompany Appeal (AT) (Ins) No. 1002 of 2021

IN THE MATTER OF: Vikash Gautamchand Jain RP of Care Office Equipment Ltd. ...Appellant

Vs.

Bank of India ...Respondent

Present: For Appellant: Mr. Nipun Singhvi, Ms. Honey Satpal, Advocates For Respondent: None

ORDER

(Through Virtual Mode)

08.12.2021: This appeal has been filed by the Appellant challenging the

order dated 25.10.2021 by which order the Learned 'Adjudicating Authority' has

fixed a date on 26.11.2021 for hearing the application for approval of 'Resolution

Plan' as well as objections thereto.

Learned Counsel for the Appellant submits that now 20.12.2021 has been

fixed. It is submitted that more than 500 days have been elapsed from filing of

the application, approval of 'Resolution Plan' has not yet been finalized.

We find no good ground to entertain this appeal, ends of justice be served

in disposing of the appeal with observation that Learned 'Adjudicating Authority'

shall endeavor to dispose of the applications I.A. Nos. 358 and 434/2020 on the

date fixed if possible or at an early date thereafter. Company Appeal (AT) (Ins) No. 1002 of 2021 1 With these observations, the appeal is disposed of.

[Justice Ashok Bhushan] Chairperson

[Justice Jarat Kumar Jain] Member (Judicial)

[Dr. Alok Srivastava] Member (Technical) Shashi/nn

Company Appeal (AT) (Ins) No. 1002 of 2021 2

This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.

Research this judgment with Miss Lucy

Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.

Try Miss Lucy free