Vasundhra Gupta, Managing Director, ... vs Sanwar Mal Tiwari, Sole Proprietor, ...
- CitationCompany Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 476 of 2020
Ratio decidendi
The rule this decision rests on
Where an operational creditor's claim for an unpaid principal amount exceeding the statutory threshold is undisputed, and the corporate debtor has not discharged it despite service of a demand notice, the default is established and the Section 9 application admitting the insolvency process is not liable to be set aside on appeal.
Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.
Judgment
As delivered
Vasundhra Gupta, Managing Director, M/s Aesthetic Stone Arts India Pvt. Ltd. ....Appellant
Vs
Mr. Sanwar Mal Tiwari, Sole Proprietor M/s. Rajasthan Steel Corporation & Anr. ....Respondents
Present For Appellant: Mr. Jasmeet Singh, Mr. Saif Ali and Mr. Pushpendra S. Bhadoriya, Advocates.
For Respondents:
ORDER
27.04.2020 The Appellant is aggrieved of admission of Application under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 at the instance of Respondent No 1 - 'Operational Creditor' as against Respondent No.2, i.e., the 'Corporate Debtor'.
After hearing the learned Counsel for the Appellant, we find that the 'Corporate Debtor' has committed default to the extent of principal amount due on Invoice No.52 for Rs.5,63,370/- as emanates from paragraph 10 of the impugned order. Since, no dispute has been raised in regard to the liability qua the principal amount, which exceed Rs.1,00,000/- and the claim has not been satisfied despite service of demand notice, we find no ground for judicial intervention with the impugned order dated 4th March, 2020.
Page 1 of 2 The Appeal being devoid of merit is dismissed. However, we make it clear that dismissal of the instant Appeal shall not stand in the way of 'Corporate Debtor' settling the claim of Respondent- 'Operational Creditor'.
[Justice Bansi Lal Bhat] Acting Chairperson
[Justice Anant Bijay Singh] Member (Judicial)
[Alok Srivastava] Member (Technical)
Ash/GC Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 476 of 2020 Page 2 of 2
This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.
Research this judgment with Miss Lucy
Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.
Try Miss Lucy free