V. Kanchana vs P. B. Radhakrishnan & Ors
- CitationCompany Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 387 of 2018
Ratio decidendi
The rule this decision rests on
A person who, at the request of a corporate debtor, pays off the corporate debtor's loan to a financial institution out of his own personal account thereby acquires the status of a financial creditor of that corporate debtor, notwithstanding that he is also a director of it. A typographical error in describing an applicant's status in Form 1 (here, describing a financial creditor as an operational creditor in one place) does not affect the initiation of the corporate insolvency resolution process and does not render the admission illegal.
Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.
Judgment
As delivered
V. Kanchana ...Appellant Vs P. B. Radhakrishnan & Ors. ....Respondents
Present:
For Appellant: Mr. Kaushik N. Sharma, Advocate.
For Respondents:
ORDER
08.08.2018: This appeal has been preferred by shareholder of the Corporate Debtor - 'M/s Deleo Construction Pvt. Ltd.', challenging order dated 9th July, 2018 passed by the Adjudicating Authority (National Company Law Tribunal), Single Bench, Chennai in CP/18/(IB)/CB/2018, admitting the application under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code filed by Respondent - 'Mr. P. B. Radhakrishnan'.
2. Learned counsel for the Appellant submits that the Respondent - Mr. P. B. Radhakrishnan is also the Director of the Corporate Debtor and cannot be treated to be a 'Financial Creditor'. It is submitted that in Form 1, at one place Respondent has been written as 'Operational Creditor'. However, we find that there is a 'typographical error' in one place which will not affect the initiation of Corporate Insolvency Resolution the Process nor can be declared to be illegal.
3. So far as status of Respondent as 'Financial Creditor' is concerned, from the record and Form 1, we find that the Corporate Debtor had taken loan from 'M/s Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited' and on its request the Respondent paid back the loan of Rs.34,48,500/- on behalf of the Corporate Debtor from its personal -2-
account. As the Respondent paid amount form his personal account on behalf of the Corporate Debtor, he comes within the meaning of 'Financial Creditor' of the Corporate Debtor.
4. We find no ground made out to interfere with the impugned order dated 9th July, 2018 passed by the Adjudicating Authority (National Company Law Tribunal), Single Bench, Chennai in CP/18/(IB)/CB/2018. In absence of any merit, the appeal is dismissed. No cost.
[Justice S. J. Mukhopadhaya] Chairperson
[Justice Bansi Lal Bhat] Member (Judicial) am/sk
Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 387 of 2018
This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.
Research this judgment with Miss Lucy
Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.
Try Miss Lucy free