Uttrakhand Power Corporation Ltd vs M/S. Ang Industries Ltd
- CitationCompany Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 298 of 2017
Ratio decidendi
The rule this decision rests on
Where a moratorium has been imposed under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 from a specified date, the supplier of electricity to the corporate debtor cannot recover dues that accrued before that date; such pre-moratorium dues may only be submitted as claims before the Resolution Professional. Current supply charges incurred after the restoration of electricity during the moratorium are payable by the corporate debtor, through its Resolution Professional, on a month-to-month basis, and the supplier is entitled to those charges from the date of restoration.
Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.
Judgment
As delivered
Uttrakhand Power Corporation Ltd. ...Appellant
Vs.
M/s. ANG Industries Ltd. ...Respondent
Present: For Appellant: - Shri Pradeep Misra, Advocate
For Respondent:- Shri Ishaan Madan and Ms. Sakshee Sharma, Advocates
ORDER
24.01.2018- The appellant - Uttarakhand Power Corporation Ltd. was
supplying electricity to the Corporate Debtor - M/s. ANG Industries Ltd. Due
to failure of payment, the electricity supply was disconnected on 28th August,
2017. In the meantime, an application for Insolvency Resolution Process
under Section 10 was filed by the Corporate Applicant wherein the
Adjudicating Authority (National Company Law Tribunal), New Delhi Bench
passed order on 31st August, 2017 admitting the application and imposed
moratorium in terms of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The
Insolvency Resolution Professional was supposed to ensure that the company
remains on-going, therefore, he filed an application for restoration of
electricity, which was allowed by the Adjudicating Authority by the impugned
order dated 9th October, 2017. The appellant - Uttarakhand Power
Corporation Ltd. restored electricity on 12th October, 2017 but having not paid 2
the outstanding dues challenged the impugned order dated 9th October, 2017
in this appeal.
2. We have heard the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant
and the learned counsel for the Insolvency Resolution Professional.
3. Taking into consideration the fact that the order of moratorium has
been passed by the Adjudicating Authority on 31st August, 2017, we are of
the view that the appellant - Uttarakhand Power Corporation Ltd. cannot
recover any amount due for the period prior to 31st August, 2017 though it
will be open the appellant to submit the claim before the Resolution
Professional. Insofar as the current charges are concerned, we hold that the
appellant is entitled to the electricity supply charges from the date of
restoration of electricity i.e. from 12th October, 2017 and the Resolution
Professional is required to pay the amount on behalf of the Corporate Debtor
on month-to-month basis.
4. In these circumstances, we direct the respondent - M/s. ANG
Industries Ltd. / Insolvency Resolution Professional to pay the current
electricity charges to the appellant for the period from 12th October, 2017
onwards. The appellant will raise the electricity bill for the period from 12th
October, 2017 to 31st October, 2017; November, 2017 and December, 2017.
The respondent - Corporate Applicant through Resolution Professional will
pay the outstanding dues in instalments - first instalment for the month of
October, 2017 to be paid by 15th February, 2018, and the dues for the month
Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 298 of 2017 3
of November be paid by 28th February, 2018; dues for the month of December,
2017 be paid by 15th March, 2018 and the dues for January, 2018 and
February, 2018 be paid by 31st March, 2018. If the respondent fails to pay
the amount within the stipulated period or in two consecutive months, it will
be open to the appellant to give notice and disconnect the electricity supply
of the Corporate Debtor.
5. The appeal stands disposed of with the aforesaid observations. No cost.
(Justice S.J. Mukhopadhaya) Chairperson
(Justice Bansi Lal Bhat) Member(Judicial) ns/uk
Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 298 of 2017
This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.
Research this judgment with Miss Lucy
Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.
Try Miss Lucy free