Uttar Gujarat Vij Company Ltd vs Pradeep Kumar Kabra & Anr
- CitationCompany Appeal (AT) (Ins.) No. 1300 of 2022
Ratio decidendi
The rule this decision rests on
A matter disposed of on the basis of a statement by counsel, recording that the other party "may consider in accordance with applicable rules and regulations", does not thereby adjudicate a claim for interest on security deposit that was not before the earlier forum; such a claim, not having been raised and decided in the earlier appeal, cannot be entertained in a subsequent application in that appeal, and the appropriate course is to seek relief before the Adjudicating Authority, which alone is to consider and decide it in accordance with law.
Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.
Judgment
As delivered
IN THE MATTER OF: Executive Engineer ....Appellant Uttar Gujarat VIJ Company Ltd.
Vs.
Pradeep Kumar Kabra ....Respondent Liquidator of Pacific Pipe systems Pvt. Ltd. & Anr.
Present: For Appellant: Mr. Vipul Ganda, Ms. Nirthi Dua, Mr. Ishan Upadhaya, Advocates. Mr. Anal S. Shah, Advocate For Respondent: Mr. Ravi Raghunath, Advocate for R-2.
ORDER
(HYBRID MODE)
18.12.2023: I.A. No. 4473 of 2023:- By this application the applicant has
prayed for following reliefs:
a. Allow the present Application;
b. Direct the Respondent No.1 to pay the interest due and payable from the date of termination of the electricity i.e. March 01, 2016 connection in the name of the Corporate Debtor, till the date of adjudication of the present application, at the interest rate prescribed in Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission (GERC) (Security Deposit) Regulations 2005 published vide Notification No: 8 of 2005;
c. Pass such further and/or other orders as deemed fit and proper in the interest of justice.
I.A. No. 4473 of 2023 in Company Appeal (AT) (Ins.) No. 1300 of 2022 -2-
2. This appeal was filed against the order of Adjudicating Authority dated
04.10.2021 while deciding the application for relief and concession filed by the
Applicant.
3. Adjudicating Authority disposed of the application and issued certain
direction in paragraph (ix) which is to the following effect:
"IX. We hold that all electricity charges accrued prior to liquidation commencement date shall stand permanently extinguished and any security deposit for connection shall continue in the name of the Corporate Debtor. We further direct Uttar Gujarat Vij Company Limited to restore the electricity supply to the Corporate Debtor so that the Corporate Debtor can be run as a going concern. The charges after the liquidation commencement date and till acquisition date shall also stand extinguished quo Successful Auction Bidder."
4. Appeal was filed by the Executive Engineer, Uttar Gujarat Vij Company
Limited which appeal was disposed of on 16.05.2023 and noticing the
submissions of the counsel for the respondent. Following submissions were
noticed of the order:
"3. When the Appeal was taken today, Learned Counsel for the Appellant submits that Appellant has already recovered all dues on the electricity connection and there are no further dues to be recovered. He further submits that the electricity connection was disconnected permanently in 2017 and Appellant is ready to give fresh connection to the Successful Bidder provided that Application and/or Form are filled up. It is further submitted that security which was already deposited with the Appellant shall be continued in the name of the Corporate Debtor. It is further
I.A. No. 4473 of 2023 in Company Appeal (AT) (Ins.) No. 1300 of 2022 -3-
submitted that electricity shall be restored within six weeks if application/form is made within two weeks from today for the restoration of the electricity.
4. It is made clear that no financial charges shall be asked from the Corporate Debtor for giving fresh connection.
5. Learned Counsel for Respondent submits that there was some entitlement of interest on the security deposited. With regard to said, the Appellant may consider in accordance with applicable rules and regulations.
6. The Appeal is disposed of, accordingly."
5. Subsequent to the aforesaid order an application was filed by Executive
Engineer, Uttar Gujarat Vij Company Limited being I.A. No. 3972/2022. Now in
this application the grievance of the applicant is that the interest of the
security deposits is not being paid which according to the regulation the
respondent was entitled. The issues which are sought to be raised in this
application were not before the Adjudicating Authority in this appeal.
6. Recording the statement of counsel for the respondent (who is applicant
before us) that the appellant may consider in accordance with the application
rules and regulations the appeal was disposed of. In event, the said
consideration is not favourable to the applicant it is always open to the
applicant to file appropriate application before the Adjudicating Authority for
relief, if any.
I.A. No. 4473 of 2023 in Company Appeal (AT) (Ins.) No. 1300 of 2022 -4-
7. We are of the view that said issues cannot be entertained in this
application nor adjudicated by this Tribunal in this appeal. We, however, make
it clear that we are not expressing any opinion on merits of the claim in the
application filed by the applicant and it is for the Adjudicating Authority to
consider and decide in accordance with law.
8. With these observations, we dispose of this application.
[Justice Ashok Bhushan] Chairperson
[Mr. Barun Mitra] Member (Technical)
sa/nn
I.A. No. 4473 of 2023 in Company Appeal (AT) (Ins.) No. 1300 of 2022
This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.
Research this judgment with Miss Lucy
Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.
Try Miss Lucy free