Union Bank Of India vs Emc Ltd. Through Resolution ...
- CitationCompany Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 1387 of 2019
Ratio decidendi
The rule this decision rests on
An appeal against an order approving a resolution plan under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 lies only on the grounds specified in sub-section (3) of Section 61, as applied through Section 32, and an appeal raising a ground outside those enumerated grounds discloses no ground for interference and may be dismissed as frivolous.
Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.
Judgment
As delivered
Union Bank of India ...Appellant
Vs
EMC Ltd. Through Resolution Professional Kannan Triuvebgadam & Ors. ...Respondents
Present: For Appellant: Mr. Rahul Gupta, Advocate.
For Respondents: Mr. Diwakar Maheshwari and Mr. Shreyas Edupuganti, Advocates.
ORDER
04.12.2019: The Appellant has challenged the plan approved by order
dated 21st October, 2019 passed by the Adjudicating Authority (National
Company Law Tribunal), Kolkata Bench, Kolkata. By said order other
applications were also disposed of.
2. On 2nd December, 2019, when the matter was taken up, the following
observation was made by this Appellate Tribunal:-
"ORDER
02.12.2019 Prima-facie the Appeal appears to be frivolous
filed by Union Bank of India as it has consented in favour of
the 'Plan' and is now challenging the 'Plan'. Nothing on the
record to suggest that grounds mentioned in either sub-
section (3) of Section 61 of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, -2-
2016 have been taken and if that be so, the Appellant has
not stated as to why it has approved the 'Plan'.
Post the case for orders on 4th December, 2019."
3. Today, it is informed that Union Bank of India has conditionally
approved the plan and not on distribution. Section 32 of the Insolvency and
Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (hereinafter referred to as 'I&B Code') has provisions
for filing an appeal against the approved plan and it reads as follows:-
"32. Appeal. - Any appeal from an order approving the
resolution plan shall be in the manner and on the grounds
laid down in sub-section (3) of section 61."
4. As per Section 32, the plan approved can be challenged on the grounds
laid down in sub-section (3) of Section 61, which are as follows:-
"61. Appeals and Appellate Authority.(1)
Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained
under the Companies Act 2013, any person aggrieved by
the order of the Adjudicating Authority under this part may
prefer an appeal to the National Company Law Appellate
Tribunal.
.....x....x...x......
Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 1387 of 2019 -3-
(3) An appeal against an order approving a resolution
plan under section 31 may be filed on the following grounds,
namely:--
(i) the approved resolution plan is in contravention of the
provisions of any law for the time being in force;
(ii) there has been material irregularity in exercise of the
powers by the resolution professional during the
corporate insolvency resolution period;
(iii) the debts owed to operational creditors of the
corporate debtor have not been provided for in the
resolution plan in the manner specified by the Board;
(iv) the insolvency resolution process costs have not
been provided for repayment in priority to all other
debts; or
(v) the resolution plan does not comply with any other
criteria specified by the Board."
5. In the present case, the only ground taken is that the distribution has
not been properly made. As the Appellant is a member who distributed the
Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 1387 of 2019 -4-
amount, no ground is made out in terms of sub-section (3) of Section 61 and
we find that the distribution was made by the Committee of Creditor in which
Appellant was also a member.
6. For aforesaid reason, we observe that this is a frivolous appeal. We
accordingly dismiss the appeal. No costs.
[Justice S. J. Mukhopadhaya] Chairperson
[Justice Bansi Lal Bhat] Member (Judicial)
[Justice Venugopal M.] Member (Judicial)
am/sk
Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 1387 of 2019
This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.
Research this judgment with Miss Lucy
Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.
Try Miss Lucy free