Uco Bank vs Mr. Abhijit Guhathkurta & Ors
- CitationCompany Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 286 of 2023
Ratio decidendi
The rule this decision rests on
The disbursement of sale proceeds of a corporate debtor's assets to members of the Committee of Creditors under the waterfall mechanism in Section 53 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, may be permitted subject to an undertaking from each recipient that any amount it receives in excess of its entitlement will be returned; such a conditional undertaking adequately protects the interests of all stakeholders, and an application seeking to restrain further disbursement on that basis is properly dismissed where the Tribunal has already sanctioned distribution on that footing.
Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.
Judgment
As delivered
IN THE MATTER OF: UCO Bank ...Appellant
Versus Abhijit Guhathkurta, Liquidator and Ors. ...Respondents
Present: For Appellant: Mr. Sumit K. Batra, Mr. Manish Khurana, Advocates For Respondent: Mr. Abhishek Swroop, Advocate for RP Mr. Akshay Supre, Mr. Abhijeet, Advocates
ORDER
15.03.2023: Heard Learned Counsel for the parties.
2. This Appeal has been filed against the Order dated 15th December, 2022
passed in I.A. No. 629 of 2022. The Appellant has filed the Application praying
for Respondent No. 1 to be restrained from disbursing any further amount
received from sale of fixed assets of the Corporate Debtor. The Adjudicating
Authority noticing paragraph 4 of the Order of this Appellate Tribunal dated
27.01.2022 in Company Appeal (AT) Insolvency No. 1068 of 2021 has dismissed
the Application.
3. In paragraph 4 of the Order of this Appellate Tribunal, following has been
observed:
2
"4. Learned counsel for the Liquidator submits that as stated by the Liquidator in his reply/counter affidavit, the Liquidator has no objection in distribution of INR 223 crores as per waterfall mechanism under Section 53 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (for short 'Code') subject to undertaking that in event any of the member of the CoC receives any amount surplus to which it was entitled would undertake to return the same."
4. It has been noted in paragraph 4 of the Order of this Tribunal that the
disbursement shall be subject to undertaking that in event any of the member
of the CoC receives any amount surplus to which it was entitled, the same shall
be returned. Thus, disbursement was to be made subject to above undertaking
which protects the interest of all.
5. In view of the aforesaid, we see no error in the Order passed by the
Adjudicating Authority, the Appeal is dismissed.
[Justice Ashok Bhushan] Chairperson
[Barun Mitra] Member (Technical)
Basant/nn Company Appeal (AT) Ins. No. 286 of 2023
This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.
Research this judgment with Miss Lucy
Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.
Try Miss Lucy free