Miss Lucy
← All judgments

Twenty First Century Erectors Pvt. ... vs Assessee

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal10 June 2015

Ratio decidendi

The rule this decision rests on

The Tribunal, having proceeded ex parte on the merits after rejecting the assessee's adjournment request, may nonetheless set aside the assessment orders and restore the grounds of appeal to the first appellate authority for a de novo decision where the assessee is a small assessee who has attempted to explain its case and it is in the interest of justice to afford one more opportunity to plead its case, with a direction that the assessee cooperate and be at liberty to file evidence.

Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.

Judgment

As delivered

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNALDELHI BENCH 'F'F' : NEW DELHIBEFORE SHRI G.C. GUPTA,GUPTA, VICE PRESIDENT ANDSHRI INTURI RAMA RAO,RAO, ACCOUNTANT MEMBERITA No.No.2428/Del/2013Assessment Year : 1999-1999-2000M/s Twenty First Century Vs. Assessing Officer,Erectors Pvt.Ltd., Ward-Ward-16(4),A-4/301, New Delhi.Printers Apartments,Sector-Sector-13, Rohini,Delhi - 110 085.PAN : AABCT6009Q.(Appellant) (Respondent)Appellant by : None.Respondent by : Shri Vikram Sahay, Sr.DR.Date of hearing : 06.04.2015Date of pronouncement : 10.06.2015ORDERPER G.C. GUPTA,GUPTA, VP :

This appeal by the assessee for the assessment year 1999-2000 is directed against the order of learned CIT(A)-XIX, New Delhi dated 1st December, 2010.

2. At the time of hearing of the appeal, none appeared on behalf of the assessee-appellant. The application of the assessee for adjournment of the case has been rejected by the Bench. Accordingly, the appeal of the assessee is being decided ex-parte qua the assessee- appellant on merits after hearing the learned DR.

3. The grounds of appeal of the assessee are as under:-

2 ITA-2428/Del/2013

"1. The learned CIT(A) erred in upholding the view of the Assessing Officer to re-open the assessment under section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

2. The learned CIT(A) erred in upholding the assessment under section 144 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

3. The learned CIT(A) erred in upholding the additions made by the Assessing Officer thereby treating the share application money as unexplained income."

4. Learned DR submitted that the assessee has not cooperated with the Department at the time of its assessment before the Assessing Officer nor before the CIT(A). He submitted that the ex-parte assessment was rightly framed in this case. He relied on the order of the Assessing Officer and the CIT(A).

5. We have considered the submissions of the learned DR and have perused the order of the Assessing Officer and the learned CIT(A). We find that the assessment in this case was framed under Section 143(3) of the Act ex-parte qua the assessee. The assessee has filed return of income declaring income of `34,900/- and was assessed at `3,35,200/-.

The assessee seems to be a small assessee and has tried to explain its case before the CIT(A). In the facts of the case, we are of the view that it shall be in the interest of justice to provide one more opportunity to the assessee to plead its case before the CIT(A). Accordingly, the orders of the Assessing Officer and the CIT(A) are set aside and the issues in the grounds of appeal of the assessee are restored to the file of the CIT(A) with the direction to pass a de-novo order in accordance with law after providing reasonable opportunity of hearing to the parties. The assessee is directed to cooperate in the matter of its appeal before the CIT(A) and shall be at liberty to file any evidence in support of its case. The assessee is further directed to cooperate in 3 ITA-2428/Del/2013

the matter of disposal of its appeal before the CIT(A). We direct accordingly.

6. In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.

Decision pronounced in the open Court on 10th June, 2015.

Sd/- Sd/- (INTURI RAMA RAO) RAO) (G.C. (G.C. GUPTA) GUPTA) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER VICE PRESIDENT

VK.

Copy forwarded to: -

1. Appellant : M/s Twenty First Century Erectors Pvt.Ltd., A-4/301, Printers Apartments, Sector- Sector-13, Rohini, Delhi - 110 085.

2. Respondent : Assessing Officer, Ward-

Ward-16(4), New Delhi.

3. CIT

4. CIT(A)

5. DR, ITAT

Assistant Registrar

This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.

Research this judgment with Miss Lucy

Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.

Try Miss Lucy free