Titan Company Limited (Titan) — Combination C-2023/10/1058
- Case No.C-2023/10/1058
Ratio decidendi
The rule this decision rests on
Where a combination is unlikely to cause an appreciable adverse effect on competition in any relevant market, the Commission need not delineate the relevant market and may leave that question open. Where the parties' combined shares are modest and the incremental share resulting from the combination is insignificant, and where other competitors are present in the market, the combination is not likely to cause an appreciable adverse effect on competition, having regard to the factors in Section 20(4) of the Act. Where a vertical relationship between the parties' businesses arises through a third-party platform, and the acquirer's and target's sales through that platform, and the platform's share of the relevant online market, are insignificant, that vertical relationship does not by itself give rise to an appreciable adverse effect on competition.
Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.
Judgment
As delivered
Notice under Section 6(2) of the Competition Act, 2002 given by Titan Company Limited
CORAM:
Ms. Ravneet Kaur Chairperson
Mr. Anil Agrawal Member
Ms. Sweta Kakkad Member
Mr. Deepak Anurag Member
Order under Section 31(1) of the Competition Act, 2002
1. On 3rd October 2023, the Competition Commission of India (Commission) received a notice under sub-section (2) of Section 6 of the Competition Act, 2002 (Act) given by Titan Company Limited (Titan/Acquirer). The notice was given pursuant to the Share Purchase Agreement dated 19th August 2023 executed between Titan, CaratLane Trading Private Limited (CaratLane/Target), and the sellers, which comprise of Mr. Mithun Padam Sacheti, Mr. Siddhartha Padam Sacheti, and Mr. Padamchand Sacheti (Hereinafter, the Acquirer and Target are collectively referred to as ‘Parties’).
2. The Proposed Combination envisages the Titan’s acquisition of additional 27.18% share capital of CaratLane, on a fully diluted basis, from the sellers. As a result of the Proposed
Combination Registration No. C-2023/10/1058
Combination, the shareholding of Titan in CaratLane will increase from 71.09% to 98.28%, on a fully diluted basis and it will have sole control over the Target.
3. In terms of Regulation 14 of the Competition Commission of India (Procedure in regard to the transaction of Business relating to Combinations) Regulations, 2011 (Combination Regulations), vide letter dated 11th October 2023, certain information and clarifications were sought from the Acquirer. The response dated 27th October 2023 was submitted by the Acquirer after seeking an extension of time.
4. The Acquirer, a public listed company, is a joint venture between certain TATA entities1 (collectively holding 25.02%) and the Tamil Nadu Industrial Development Corporation (TIDCO) (holding 27.88%). Titan commenced its operations in the year 1987 under the name Titan Watches Limited and has since diversified its operations in several product categories including, jewellery, eyecare, fragrances, fashion accessories, and Indian dress wear.
5. The Target, a subsidiary of Titan, is a private limited company engaged in the business of manufacture and sale of gems and jewellery in India. CaratLane has only one wholly-owned subsidiary namely StudioC Inc. It is incorporated in the United States of America and does not derive any sales in India.
6. It is submitted that the activities of the Parties exhibit horizontal overlaps at a broad level in the market for manufacture and sale of gems and jewellery in India (Broad Market) and at a narrower level in the organized segment for manufacture and sale of gems and jewellery in India (Narrow Segment).
7. The Commission decided to leave the delineation of the relevant market open, as it was observed that the Proposed Combination is not likely to cause an appreciable adverse effect on competition in any of the relevant markets in India.
1TATA entities are TATA Sons Private Limited (20.85%), TATA Investment Corporation Limited (2.01%), TATA Chemicals Limited (1.56%), Ewart Investments Limited (0.56%) and Piem Hotels Limited (0.04%).
Combination Registration No. C-2023/10/1058
8. Based on the submissions of the Acquirer, the Commission noted that the incremental market share in the Broad Market and Narrow Segment is insignificant. The combined market shares of the Parties in the Broad Market and Narrow Segment are in the range of [5-10]% and [15-20]%, respectively in terms of value. Further, there are other players present in the market such as Malabar Gold and Diamonds, Joyalukkas Jewellery, PC Jeweller, Amrapali Jewels, Tribhovandas Bhimji Zaveri Limited, Kalyan Jewellers, GRT Jewellers, Senco Gold & Diamonds, Thangamayil Jewellery, Bluestone, Candere, Orra, Giva, Mellora etc.
9. It is also submitted that a vertical relationship exists between CaratLane and the TATA group’s entities through an e-commerce platform TATA CLiQ, on which CaratLane sells its products. Based on the submission of the Acquirer it is noted that CaratLane’s sales through TATA CLiQ form a miniscule proportion of its own total sales. Further, its sales on TATA CLiQ is insignificant in terms of total sales on TATA CLiQ as well as total gems and jewellery sold on TATA CLiQ. Additionally, TATA CLiQ’s market share for online sales of gems and jewellery is also insignificant.
10. Considering the material on record, including the details provided in the Notice and the assessment of the Proposed Combination based on the factors stated in Section 20(4) of the Act, the Commission is of the opinion that the Proposed Combination is not likely to have any appreciable adverse effect on competition in India. Therefore, the Commission approves the Proposed Combination under Section 31(1) of the Act.
11. This order may stand revoked if, at any time, the information provided by the Acquirer is found to be incorrect.
12. The information provided by the Acquirer shall be treated as confidential in terms of and subject to provisions of Section 57 of the Act.
Combination Registration No. C-2023/10/1058
13. The Secretary is directed to communicate to the Acquirer accordingly.
This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.
Research this judgment with Miss Lucy
Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.
Try Miss Lucy free