Thiagarajan Murugesan vs G.Gunasekaran & Ors
- CitationCompany Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 809 of 2019
Ratio decidendi
The rule this decision rests on
The Appellate Tribunal declined to decide whether particular properties belonged to the appellant, holding that no finding on that question had been recorded by the Adjudicating Authority and that the Tribunal would not decide it in appeal. Where a party asserts that a property belongs to a third party against the corporate debtor's assets, the proper course is for that party to apply to the Resolution Professional, who is to examine the claim under Section 18 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.
Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.
Judgment
As delivered
Mr. Thiagarajan Murugesan ...Appellant
Versus
G. Gunasekaran & Ors. ...Respondents
Present: For Appellant : Mr. N. Ramakrishnan, Advocate
For Respondents : Mr. C.A. Sinha and Ms. Sonali Khanna, Advocates
ORDER
08.08.2019 The Adjudicating Authority (National Company Law Tribunal),
Special Bench, Chennai by impugned order dated 17th July, 2019 passed the
following directions :
"Therefore this Bench hereby directs R1 to R4 to
provide the required documents to the RP within 10 days
hereof, failing which, this Bench hereby requests the
District Collector of Madurai to provide assistance to the
RP take custody of the records sought by the RP as well
as any other assistance that is essential in discharging
his functions as RP in the CIRP period as contemplated
under Section 19(2) of IBC r/w 429 of the Companies Act,
2013"
2. The Appellant is the 1st Respondent to the application which was preferred
before the Adjudicating Authority and the direction as given above is to all the
'Promoters/Directors' of the 'Corporate Debtor'.
3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Appellant submits that since
2013 he is not the Director and whose shareholding with the company is no
longer there since there 2015. If that be so, the Appellant needs to co-operate
with the 'Resolution Professional' and state as to who is in the possession of the
record of the 'Corporate Debtor'. Learned counsel for the Appellant submits that
some properties belongs to the Appellant, but no such finding is given in the
impugned order by the Adjudicating Authority and we are not inclined to decide
the same. However, the Appellant may file an application before the 'Resolution
Professional' to show that any particular property belongs to 3rd Party and in
such case, the 'Resolution Professional' will examine the same in terms of Section
18 of the 'I&B Code' preferably within 3 weeks thereof.
The appeal stands disposed of with aforesaid observations.
[Justice S.J. Mukhopadhaya] Chairperson
[ Justice A.I.S. Cheema ] Member (Judicial)
[ Kanthi Narahari ] Member (Technical) /ns/sk
Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 809 of 2019
This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.
Research this judgment with Miss Lucy
Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.
Try Miss Lucy free