The Phoenix Mills Limited — Combination C-2025/08/1310
- Case No.C-2025/08/1310
Ratio decidendi
The rule this decision rests on
Where the relevant market cannot be defined with certainty, the Commission may leave its delineation open if the combination is not likely to cause an appreciable adverse effect on competition (AAEC) in any plausible relevant market in India. Vertical linkages that consist only of ancillary services between the parties, such as common area maintenance, licence fees, food and beverage services and marketing expense recovery, do not raise an AAEC concern where the combination does not change market dynamics. Horizontal overlaps in the commercial segment in Bengaluru and Pune and in the retail segment in Pune, Bengaluru and Indore do not give rise to a competition concern that would amount to an AAEC. On an assessment of the combination against the factors in Section 20(4) of the Act, a combination that is not likely to have an AAEC in India is approved under Section 31(1) of the Act. An approval under Section 31(1) may be revoked if the information furnished by the acquirer is found to be incorrect at any time. Information furnished by the acquirer in a notice under Section 6(2) is to be treated as confidential under Section 57 of the Act.
Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.
Judgment
As delivered
Notice under Section 6(2) of the Competition Act, 2002 given by The Phoenix Mills Limited
CORAM: Ms. Ravneet Kaur Chairperson
Mr. Anil Agrawal Member
Ms. Sweta Kakkad Member
Mr. Deepak Anurag Member
Order under Section 31(1) of the Competition Act, 2002
1. On 01st August 2025, the Competition Commission of India (Commission) received a Notice under Section 6(2) of the Competition Act, 2002 (Act) given by the Phoenix Mills Limited (PML/Acquirer).
2. The Notice was filed pursuant to the execution of the Framework Agreement dated 24th July 2025 amongst Canada Pension Plan Investment Board (CPPIB/Seller), PML and Island Star Mall Developers Private Limited (ISMDPL/Target). Pursuant to the filing of the Notice, the Acquirer also made a voluntary submission vide communication dated 12th August 2025.
Combination Registration Number: C-2025/08/1310
3. The Proposed Combination involves acquisition of 49% shareholding in the Target by the Acquirer (or through its Affiliates) thereby becoming the 100% shareholder and acquiring sole control, directly or indirectly, in the Target.
4. The Acquirer is engaged in the development (including designing, execution, marketing etc.), operations and leasing of commercial and retail spaces, including retail malls, commercial offices, hospitality assets, food & beverages and sale of residential properties, through its various subsidiaries. It has presence in several cities such as Mumbai, Bengaluru, Pune, Chennai and Indore.
5. The Target, directly and through its subsidiaries, is primarily active in the development (including designing, execution, marketing etc.), operations and leasing of commercial and retail real estate, in cities of Pune, Bengaluru and Indore.
6. It is observed that the activities of the Parties primarily overlap in the business segments for retail and commercial real estate, in particular, the development (including designing, execution, marketing etc.), operations and leasing of retail (in cities of Pune, Bengaluru and Indore) and commercial spaces (in the cities of Pune and Bengaluru).
7. The Commission decided to leave the delineation of the relevant market open, as it was observed that the Proposed Combination is not likely to cause appreciable adverse effect on competition (AAEC) in any of the plausible relevant market(s) in India.
8. In relation to the vertical overlaps, it is noted that there exist certain linkages between the activities of the parties. These activities are limited to the provisions of services such as common area maintenance, licence fees, providing food & beverage services, marketing expenses recovery etc. and the Proposed Combination is not changing the market dynamics in any manner.
Combination Registration Number: C-2025/08/1310
9. With regard to the horizontal overlaps, it has been observed that the presence of the Parties in commercial segment in the cities of Bengaluru and Pune and in the retail segment in the cities of Pune, Bengaluru and Indore is likely to cause any competition concern.
10. Considering the material on record, including the details provided in the Notice and the assessment of the Proposed Combination based on the factors stated in Section 20(4) of the Act, the Commission is of the opinion that the Proposed Combination is not likely to have AAEC in India. Therefore, the Commission approves the Proposed Combination under Section 31(1) of the Act.
11. The order may be revoked if, at any time, the information provided by the Acquirer is found to be incorrect.
12. The information provided by the Acquirer shall be treated as confidential in terms of and subject to provisions of Section 57 of the Act.
13. The Secretary is directed to communicate to the Acquirer accordingly.
This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.
Research this judgment with Miss Lucy
Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.
Try Miss Lucy free