Miss Lucy
← All judgments

The Assistant Commissioner Of Custom vs Shri Kshitiz Chhawchharia

National Company Law Appellate Tribunal13 August 2024

Ratio decidendi

The rule this decision rests on

A claimant who files its claim with the liquidator more than three and a half years after the last date for submission of claims, without a separate application seeking condonation of that delay and without proper justification for it, cannot have the belated claim admitted; and where substantial assets of the corporate debtor have already been distributed, the adjudicating authority does not err in rejecting the application seeking to admit the claim.

Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.

Judgment

As delivered

NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNALPRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHICompany Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 1446 of 2024&I.A. No. 5271 of 2024

IN THE MATTER OF: The Assistant Commissioner of Customs, O/o The Principal Commissioner of Customs ...Appellant Versus Kshitiz Chhawchharia, Liquidator, Concast Steel & Power Ltd. ...Respondent

Present: For Appellant : Mr. Akshay Amritanshu, Advocate.

For Respondent : Soorjya Ganguli and Ms. Kiran Shah, Advocates for Liquidator.

ORDER

(Hybrid Mode)

13.08.2024 : Heard Counsel for the Appellant as well as Counsel for the

Respondent.

2. This Appeal has been filed against an Order dated 01.05.2024 passed

by the Learned Adjudicating Authority (National Company Law Tribunal,

Kolkata Bench, Court - II), by which Order, the Adjudicating Authority has

rejected the I.A. 560/2023 filed by the Appellant under Section 42 of the

Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.

3. The Liquidation Order against the Corporate Debtor was passed on

26.09.2018. Appellant claimed to have filed its Claim before the Liquidator

on 16.08.2022.

4. The Adjudicating Authority in Paragraph 24 of the Order has stated:

"24. Since the last date was submission of claim was 26th October, 2018 and the claim was lodged on 16th August, 2022 along with Form C due to the reasons mentioned above and having noted the enormous delay in preferring the claim without any proper justification and separate application seeking condonation of delay, we deem it appropriate to reject the application."

5. The only reason mentioned by the Appellant was that they were not

aware of the Liquidation Order, hence the delay was caused in filing the Claim.

Last date for admission of Claim was 26.10.2018 and the Claim was filed after

more than three and a half years.

6. Learned Counsel for the Liquidator submits that substantial assets

have already been distributed.

7. The facts of the above case that Adjudicating Authority did not commit

any error in rejecting the I.A. 560/2023 filed by the Appellant.

We do not find any merit in the Appeal. The Appeal is dismissed.

[Justice Ashok Bhushan] Chairperson

[Barun Mitra] Member (Technical)

[Arun Baroka] Member (Technical) himanshu/nn

Comp. App. (AT) (Ins.) No. 1446 of 2024 & I.A. No. 5271 of 2024 2 of 2

This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.

Research this judgment with Miss Lucy

Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.

Try Miss Lucy free