Miss Lucy
← All judgments

Tej Satish Ghatge vs Opulent Auto Care Private Limited & Anr

National Company Law Appellate Tribunal16 March 2022

Ratio decidendi

The rule this decision rests on

Where a settlement is entered into after the Adjudicating Authority has admitted a Section 9 application but before the Committee of Creditors is constituted, the appropriate course is for the party to approach the Adjudicating Authority by an application under Section 12A of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, rather than seeking the Appellate Tribunal to record the settlement, the Tribunal having no occasion to dispose of such a settlement in the first instance. Where the Committee of Creditors has already been constituted before the settlement is reached, the settlement is to be placed before the Adjudicating Authority under Section 12A and considered by it in accordance with law, the Tribunal granting liberty for that purpose rather than itself recording the settlement.

Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.

Judgment

As delivered

NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNALPRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHICompany Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 145 of 2022IN THE MATTER OF:

Tej Satish Ghatge ...Appellant

Versus

Opulent Autocare Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. ...Respondents

Present: For Appellants: Mr. Shashwat Anand, Mr. Shasshwat Parihar, Mr. Dhruva Vig, Adya Singh, Advocates For Respondents: Mr. KV Balakrishnan, Mr. J P Singh, Advocates for R-1. Mr. Hajari Lal Saini, for R-2, IRP

ORDER

(Virtual Mode)

16.03.2022: Heard Learned Counsel for the Appellant.

2. This Appeal has been filed against the Order dated 19.01.2022 passed

by the Adjudicating Authority in CP(IB) No. 3382/MB-IV/2019. By which

Order, Application filed by the Respondent under Section 9 of the Insolvency

and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC in short) has been admitted.

3. In this Appeal, an I.A. No. 734 of 2022 has been filed by the Appellant

bringing on record a Settlement dated 05th March, 2022 and it is submitted

that now the Appellant has settled the matter with the Operational Creditor

and has made entire payment hence this Court may record the Settlement

dated 05th March, 2022 and pass such order as may it deem fit.

4. The Learned Counsel for the parties submits that CoC has already been

constituted on 22nd February, 2022. In so far as the Order which is sought to

be challenged in the Appeal, we have already referred to the Judgment of the 2

Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in Civil Appeal No. 2839 of 2022 in the

proceedings dated 16th February, 2022. The Operational Debt as claimed by

the Operational Creditor, part of which was clearly admitted and submissions

were raised with regard to another part. In view of the Judgment of the Hon'ble

Apex Court as noted above, it was clear case of an Operational Debt hence no

error was committed in admitting the Application under Section 9 of the Code.

However, Settlement has been entered into between the parties on 05th March,

2022 and the CoC has been constituted prior to 05th March, 2022 i.e. on

22.02.2022, we grant liberty to the Appellant to file an appropriate Application

before the Adjudicating Authority under Section 12A in the proceedings being

CP (IB) No. 3382/MB-IV/2019 and Adjudicating Authority may consider the

Application under Section 12A of the IBC and take appropriate steps in

accordance with law.

5. Learned Counsel for the Appellant has placed reliance on the Judgment

of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in "Swiss Ribbons Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India",

(2019) 4 SCC 17 wherein paragraph 82 following has been laid down:

"It is clear that once the Code gets triggered by admission of a creditor's petition under Sections 7 to 9, the proceeding that is before the Adjudicating Authority, being a collective proceeding, is a proceeding in rem. Being a proceeding in rem, it is necessary that the body which is to oversee the resolution process must be consulted before any individual corporate debtor is allowed to settle its claim. A question arises as to what is to happen before a committee of creditors is constituted (as per the timelines that are specified, a committee of creditors can be appointed at any time within 30 days from the date of appointment of the interim resolution professional). We make it clear that at any stage

Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 145 of 2022.

3 where the committee of creditors is not yet constituted, a party can approach the NCLT directly, which Tribunal may, in exercise of its inherent powers under Rule 11 of the NCLT Rules, 2016, allow or disallow an application for withdrawal or settlement. This will be decided after hearing all the concerned parties and considering all relevant factors on the facts of each case."

6. Sentence on which emphasis has been made by the Learned Counsel

for the Appellant is "we make it clear that at any stage where the CoC is not

yet constituted, a party can approach NCLT directly, which Tribunal may, in

exercise of its inherent powers under Rule 11 of NCLT Rules, 2016, allow or

disallow an application for withdrawal or settlement"

7. In view of the above observations of the Hon'ble Supreme Court, we are

of the view that Appellant has to approach the NCLT by filing an Application

under Section 12A of the Code for settlement with the Operational Creditor.

With the above observations, we dispose of this Appeal.

[Justice Ashok Bhushan] Chairperson

[Dr. Alok Srivastava] Member (Technical)

Basant/nn

Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 145 of 2022.

This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.

Research this judgment with Miss Lucy

Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.

Try Miss Lucy free