Miss Lucy
← All judgments

Tariq Abdulla Suleman (Ex-Director Of ... vs Bank Of India Limited & Anr

National Company Law Appellate Tribunal1 August 2023Ashok Bhushan

Ratio decidendi

The rule this decision rests on

The order rests on a single principle, stated in its own reasoning: where the entire amount claimed by the financial creditor has been paid before the appellate decision, no debt remains outstanding, and there is accordingly no purpose in continuing the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process, so the order admitting the application under Section 7 is set aside and the CIRP is closed with the corporate debtor released from the insolvency process.

Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.

Judgment

As delivered

NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNALPRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHII.A. No. 3512 of 2023inCompany Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 804 of 2023IN THE MATTER OF:

Tariq Abdulla Suleman ...Appellant

Versus

Bank of India Ltd. & Anr. ...Respondent

Present: For Appellant: Advocate Vimal Singh, Advocate Mahesh Agarwal, Advocate Rishi Agarwal, Advocate Geetika Sharma. For Respondent: Advocate Azeem, for R-1

ORDER

01.08.2023: This Appeal has been filed against the Order dated 23rd

June, 2023 by National Company Law Tribunal, Mumbai Bench by which

order application filed under Section 7 of I & B Code, 2016 by the Bank of

India has been admitted. Section 7 Application was filed by the Bank of India

for claiming due of Rs. 111,61,53,766/-.

2. An I.A. No. 3512 of 2023 has been filed by the Appellant bringing on

record the material to indicate that entire outstanding amount claimed by the

Bank has been paid on 28th July, 2023. The Appellant has annexed the emails

exchanged between the parties.

3. Learned Counsel for the Bank submits that although he has received

instructions that amount has been paid but Appeal may be taken after a week. -2-

4. Learned Counsel for the Appellant submits that in view of the entire

payment being made, no debt is due and hence there is no purpose for

continuing with the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP in short).

5. In view of the fact that entire payment has been made, we see no reason

to continue with the CIRP. The Order dated 23rd June, 2023 is set aside. CIRP

is closed and Corporate Debtor is freed from the Insolvency Process. Learned

Counsel for the Appellant undertakes to make the payment of fee and

expenses of IRP as per the bills to be submitted by the IRP.

The Appeal is disposed of.

[Justice Ashok Bhushan] Chairperson

[Mr. Barun Mitra] Member (Technical)

Basant/nn

Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 804/2023

This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.

Research this judgment with Miss Lucy

Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.

Try Miss Lucy free