Tanya Bhatnagar vs Mohamed Hesham Amin Basha Mashaal & Anr
- CitationCompany Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 149 of 2019
Ratio decidendi
The rule this decision rests on
Where an application under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 is filed by a person who has no arrangement or agreement with the corporate debtor against which it is directed, such application is not maintainable, as the requisite relationship of operational creditor and corporate debtor is absent. Where the operational creditor has no relationship with the corporate debtor and the Section 9 application is filed for a purpose other than the resolution of insolvency or liquidation of the corporate debtor, the matter is one for consideration under Section 65 of the Code, and the adjudicating authority must first give notice to the applicant and hear him before passing any order under that section.
Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.
Judgment
As delivered
Tanya Bhatnagar ...Appellant
Vs.
Mohamed Hesham Amin Basha Mashaa'l & Anr. ...Respondents
Present: For Appellant: - Mr. Deepender Hooda, Ms. Jyoti Hooda and Mr. C.P. Malik, Advocates.
For Respondents: - Mr. Mohinder Singh, RP.
O R D E R
31.07.2019─ This appeal has been preferred by the Director of
'M/s. Global Energy Talent Private Limited' ('Corporate Debtor') against
the order dated 19th December, 2018 passed by the Adjudicating
Authority (National Company Law Tribunal), New Delhi, Bench-III,
whereby application under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy
Code, 2016 ("I&B Code' for short) filed by Mr. Mohamed Hesham
Mohamed Amin Basha Mashaa'l, who claimed to be 'Operational
Creditor' has been admitted.
2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Appellant submitted
that the Respondent- Mr. Mohamed Hesham Mohamed Amin Basha
Mashaa'l had arrangement with one 'Global Energy Talent, Mauritius'
and not with 'M/s. Global Energy Talent Private Limited', an Indian
Contd/-..........
-2-
Company, but Demand Notice under Section 8(1) was issued to 'M/s.
Global Energy Talent Private Limited'- ('Corporate Debtor').
3. It was brought to our notice that no agreement or arrangement
was made between 'M/s. Global Energy Talent Private Limited' and the
1st Respondent and, therefore, no application under Section 9 of the
'I&B Code' was maintainable.
4. On notice, the 1st Respondent had appeared through their
counsel and on 24th April, 2019, it was informed that the parties were
negotiating the matter and one Mr. Sameer Rastogi, Advocate for
Intervener appeared on behalf of 'M/s. Global Energy Talent, Mauritius'.
5. On 29th July, 2019, when the matter was taken up, Mr. Mohinder
Singh, 'Resolution Professional' appeared and one Mr. Susheel Sharma,
Advocate appeared on behalf of one of the Creditors. However, no
appearance was given on behalf of 1st Respondent- Mr. Mohamed
Hesham Mohamed Amin Basha Mashaa'l, nor the counsel for 'M/s.
Global Energy Talent, Mauritius' appeared. It was informed that the
parties have settled the matter and, therefore, there is no need for
appearance on their behalf.
6. Mr. Mohinder Singh, the 'Resolution Professional' submitted that
he has worked for about five months and incurred cost total of which
comes to roughly Rs. 6 lakhs.
Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 149 of 2019 -3-
7. Learned counsel for the Appellant submits that 'M/s. Global
Energy Talent Private Limited' is not liable to pay but in case it is to be
allowed, then the 'Resolution Professional' can withdraw the amount
from the account of 'M/s. Global Energy Talent Private Limited', as he is
the custodian of the said Company, alleged 'Corporate Debtor'.
8. Taking into consideration the fact that 1st Respondent has not
disputed that it had no arrangement or agreement with 'M/s. Global
Energy Talent Private Limited', an Indian entity shown as 'Corporate
Debtor' and had settled the matter with 'M/s. Global Energy Talent,
Mauritius', it appears to us that the application under Section 9 was
filed by 1st Respondent with malicious intention for purpose other than
for the resolution of insolvency, or liquidation of 'M/s. Global Energy
Talent Private Limited', as liable for action under Section 65 of the 'I&B
Code'. This apart, as in absence of any relationship of the 'Operational
Creditor' and the 'Corporate Debtor' between Mr. Mohamed Hesham
Mohamed Amin Basha Mashaa'l and 'M/s. Global Energy Talent Private
Limited', an Indian entity, we hold that the application under Section 9
was not maintainable.
9. For the reasons aforesaid, we set aside the impugned order dated
19th December, 2018.
10. In effect, order (s), passed by the Adjudicating Authority
appointing 'Interim Resolution Professional', declaring moratorium,
Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 149 of 2019 -4-
freezing of account, and all other order (s) passed by the Adjudicating
Authority pursuant to impugned order and action, if any, taken by the
'Interim Resolution Professional', including the advertisement published
in the newspaper calling for applications all such orders and actions are
declared illegal and are set aside. The application preferred by
Respondent under Section 9 of the 'I&B Code' is dismissed. Learned
Adjudicating Authority will now close the proceeding. The 'Corporate
Debtor' (company) is released from all the rigour of law and is allowed to
function independently through its Board of Directors from immediate
effect.
11. Though to ensure that the 'Interim Resolution Professional' does
not suffer, we direct 'M/s. Global Energy Talent Private Limited' to pay a
sum of Rs.6 Lakhs after adjusting the amount of Rs. 2 lakhs as has
been paid by 'M/s. Global Energy Talent, Mauritius' within a period of
three weeks. However, it will be open to 'M/s. Global Energy Talent
Private Limited' to recover the amount from Mr. Mohamed Hesham
Mohamed Amin Basha Mashaa'l. The matter is also remitted to the
Adjudicating Authority to decide whether any order is required to be
passed against Mr. Mohamed Hesham Mohamed Amin Basha Mashaa'l
under Section 65 of the 'I&B Code' on the ground that the application
was filed by him fraudulently with malicious intention for purpose other
than for the resolution of insolvency, or liquidation. Before deciding
Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 149 of 2019 -5-
such issue, the Adjudicating Authority will have to give notice to Mr.
Mohamed Hesham Mohamed Amin Basha Mashaa'l and after hearing
pass any order under Section 65.
12. This order will not come in the way of other creditors who may
move before appropriate forum for appropriate relief. The appeal is
allowed with aforesaid observation. However, in the facts and
circumstances of the case, there shall be no order as to cost.
(Justice S.J. Mukhopadhaya) Chairperson
(Justice A.I.S. Cheema) Member(Judicial)
(Kanthi Narahari) Member(Technical) Ar/g
Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 149 of 2019
This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.
Research this judgment with Miss Lucy
Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.
Try Miss Lucy free