Tamil Nadu Generation & Distribution ... vs Asset Reconstruction Company (India) ...
- CitationCompany Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 935 of 2019
Ratio decidendi
The rule this decision rests on
The Appellate Tribunal condones a delay of eleven days in preferring the appeal where the appellant has shown sufficient cause, and disposes of the interlocutory application accordingly. Where a resolution plan approved by the Adjudicating Authority records a claim that the appellant, a claimant against the corporate debtor, disputes as not payable, the appellant may seek correction of the approved plan by applying to the Adjudicating Authority, with the successful resolution applicant impleaded, under sub-section (2) of Section 420 of the Companies Act, 2013 read with Rule 11 of the NCLT Rules, 2016, such correction being permissible without affecting the rights of other creditors or the successful resolution applicant.
Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.
Judgment
As delivered
Tamil Nadu Generation & Distribution Corporation Ltd. ...Appellant
Versus
Asset Reconstruction Company (India) Ltd. & Ors. ...Respondents
Present: For Appellant : Mr. S. Vallinayagam, Advocate
For Respondents : Mr. Chitranshul A. Sinha, Ms. Sonali Khanna and Mr. Anshuman Mohit Chaturvedi, Advocates
ORDER
11.09.2019 Having heard learned counsel for the appellant and being
satisfied with the grounds, the delay of 11 days in preferring the appeal is
condoned.
I.A. No. 2817 of 2019 stands disposed of.
Learned counsel for the Appellant submits that whatever claim of the
Appellant towards supply of energy is concerned, were released prior to the
admission of the application under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy
Code, 2016 (for short, 'the I&B Code'). No further amount is payable by the
'Corporate Debtor' to the Appellant - 'Tamil Nadu General and Distribution
Corporate Ltd.'. However, 'Resolution Professional' has wrongly shown a sum of
Rs. 82,32,871/- is payable by the 'Corporate Debtor' to 'Tamil Nadu General and
Distribution Corporate Ltd.', which has been approved by the Adjudicating 2
Authority (National Company Law Tribunal), Single Bench, Chennai by
impugned order dated 19th June, 2019. It is submitted that if the said amount
is paid to the Appellant - 'Tamil Nadu General and Distribution Corporate Ltd.',
it cannot be accounted for.
Mr. Chitranshul A. Sinha, Advocate appears on behalf of 1st Respondent /
Caveator (Asset Reconstruction Company (India) Ltd. - Financial Creditor).
Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration
the stand taken by the Appellant, we allow the Appellant to move before the
Adjudicating Authority (National Company Law Tribunal), Chennai by filing
appropriate petition with a request to the Adjudicating Authority to implead
'High-Tech Bio Product' - 'successful resolution applicant' to exercise powers
conferred under sub-section (2) of Section 420 of the Companies Act, 2013 read
with Rule 11 of the NCLT Rules, 2016 and, if so required, the Adjudicating
Authority may make necessary corrections/order with regard to the approved
plan in question without affecting the right of one or other creditors or
'successful resolution applicant'. If such an application is filed within four
weeks, the Adjudicating Authority will consider the same as per observations
made above.
The appeal stands disposed of. No costs.
[Justice S.J. Mukhopadhaya] Chairperson
[ Kanthi Narahari ] Member (Technical) /ns/gc
Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 935 of 2019
This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.
Research this judgment with Miss Lucy
Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.
Try Miss Lucy free