Sushil Kumar Aggarwal vs Prayag Polytech Pvt.Ltd And Anr
- CitationCompany Appeal (AT) (Ins.) No. 700 of 2022
Ratio decidendi
The rule this decision rests on
The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn because the claim was settled and the amount paid, and no adjudication of any legal question was undertaken. The order records only consent-based disposal and procedural directions: the Adjudicating Authority is directed to number and dispose of a Section 12A withdrawal application, and the impugned order is stayed pending that disposal. No principle of law is laid down or applied in the reasoning, so there is no ratio to extract. NO_RATIO: The order disposes of the appeal by consent on settlement and withdrawal, and gives no reasoning on any point of law; it contains only procedural directions and a stay pending the Section 12A application.
Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.
Judgment
As delivered
Company Appeal (AT) (Ins.) No. 700 of 2022 IN THE MATTER OF: Sushil Kumar Aggarwal ....Appellant
Vs.
Prayag Polytech Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. ...Respondents
Present: For Appellant: Mr. Mohit Chaudhary and Mr. Prakhar Mithal, Advocates For Respondents: Mr. Vipul Ganda, Guresha Bhamra for R-1. Mr. Parag Singhal for RP, R-2. Mr. Deep Bisht for R-2, IRP.
ORDER
(Virtual Mode)
22.06.2022: It is represented on behalf of both sides that as per the
Settlement Agreement dated 15.06.2022 the amount was settled by the
Corporate Debtor and this particular fact has not been disputed by the
1st Respondent side. In fact, the Learned Counsel for the Respondent No. 1
brings it to the notice of this 'Tribunal' that the amount of Rs. 12,64,405/-
was fully paid by the Corporate Debtor.
In view of the fact that the amount of Rs. 12,64,405/- was paid and
the matter was settled pursuant to the Settlement Agreement dated
15.06.2022 between the parties, the Learned Counsel for the Appellant
seeks permission from this 'Tribunal' to withdraw the instant Comp. App.
(AT) (Ins.) No. 700 of 2022. Acceding to the said request, the instant Comp.
App. (AT) (Ins.) No. 700 of 2022 is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.
On behalf of Respondent No. 2, it is brought to the notice of this
'Tribunal' that an application as per Section 12 (A) of IBC, 2016 was filed
Comp. App. (AT) (Ins.) No. 700 of 2022 1 before the Adjudicating Authority on 20.06.2022 and because of summer
recess, the 'Application' is not yet numbered by the office of the
'Adjudicating Authority' (National Company Law Tribunal, Allahabad Bench,
Prayagraj), the application cannot be numbered.
Taking into account of the fact that the Respondent No. 2/Interim
Resolution Professional has preferred the Section 12 A application under the
I&B code, 2016, before the 'Adjudicating Authority' seeking 'Withdrawal' of
the main application as per Regulation 30A of the IBBI (Corporate
Insolvency Process for Corporate Persons) Regulations, 2016, the
Adjudicating Authority (National Company Law Tribunal, Allahabad Bench,
Prayagraj) is directed to take up the Section 12 A application (filed under
I&B Code 2016) and to number the same, if it is otherwise in order, and to
dispose of the said application within one week from the date of numbering
of the said application and to dispose of the same in accordance with Law
and in the manner known to Law, within two weeks thereafter.
Till the disposal of the Section 12 A 'Application', the implementation
of the impugned order dated 13.06.2022 passed by the 'Adjudicating
Authority' in CP (IB) No. 312/ALD/2019 shall remain stayed.
[Justice M. Venugopal] Member (Judicial)
[Kanthi Narahari] Member (Technical) sa/gc
Comp. App. (AT) (Ins.) No. 700 of 2022 2
This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.
Research this judgment with Miss Lucy
Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.
Try Miss Lucy free