Miss Lucy
← All judgments

Supraja Textiles Pvt Ltd vs Na

National Company Law Appellate Tribunal22 October 2019

Ratio decidendi

The rule this decision rests on

The Tribunal condones a delay in preferring the appeal and sets aside the Adjudicating Authority's order, directing the Committee of Creditors to consider prospective resolution plans within three weeks, on the ground that the third proviso to Section 12A, inserted with effect from 16 August 2019, permits the period to be excluded and the Appellant is entitled to rely on it.

Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.

Judgment

As delivered

NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNALNEW DELHICompany Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 1064 of 2019IN THE MATTER OF:

Supraja Textiles Pvt. Ltd. ...Appellant

Present: For Appellant : Mr. Mohan Raj, Mr. Deepayan Mandal and Mr. Janmejay Giridhar, Advocates

ORDER

22.10.2019 In the 'Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process' of 'Supraja

Textiles Private Limited', the 'Resolution Professional' (Appellant herein)

preferred the application for exclusion of certain period to enable the 'Committee

of Creditors' to accept the prospective 'resolution plan'. The Adjudicating

Authority (National Company Law Tribunal), Hyderabad Bench, Hyderabad by

impugned order dated 5th August, 2019 rejected the application.

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Appellant referred to the third

proviso to Section 12A which was amended and came into effect from 16th

August, 2019 and submitted that the Appellant should be allowed to exclude the

period in accordance with the said provision.

We have heard the learned counsel for the Appellant and in view of the

insertion of the third proviso to Section 12A of the 'I&B Code', we condone the

15 days delay in preferring the appeal and set aside the impugned order dated

5th August, 2019 to enable the 'Committee of Creditors' to consider the

prospective resolution plans, in accordance with, law preferably within three -2-

weeks and thereafter place the matter before the Adjudicating Authority for

approval and/or for liquidation, as the case may be.

The appeal is allowed with aforesaid observation.

[Justice S.J. Mukhopadhaya] Chairperson

[ Justice A.I.S. Cheema ] Member (Judicial)

[ Kanthi Narahari ] Member (Technical) /ns/gc

Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 1064 of 2019

This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.

Research this judgment with Miss Lucy

Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.

Try Miss Lucy free