Subha Singhvi, Faridabad vs Assessee
- CitationITA No.691/Del/2014
Ratio decidendi
The rule this decision rests on
Prepayment charges paid by an assessee to a lender for the early foreclosure of a housing loan, where the loan was taken for property let out to generate rental income, are deductible as interest under section 24(b) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, in computing income under the head "Income from house property", because the tribunal, following the decision of the Mumbai Bench in Windermere Properties (P) Ltd. v. DCIT, treats such charges as a part of the interest payable on the loan; where the facts are materially similar to that precedent, the tribunal follows it and allows the deduction.
Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.
Judgment
As delivered
This appeal by the assessee is directed against the order passed by
the CIT(A) on 18.11.2013 in relation to the Assessment Year 2008-09. ITA No.691/Del/2014 2
2. The only issue raised in this appeal is against the confirmation of
disallowance of foreclosure charges amounting to Rs.4,30,008/- paid by
the assessee to ICICI Bank housing loan as interest u/s 2(28A) of the
Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter also called 'the Act')
3. Briefly stated, the facts of the case are that the assessee earned
rental income from certain properties and claimed deduction for interest
on loan amounting to Rs.29,89,223/-. On perusal of the interest
certificate given by the bank, it was noticed by the AO that out of such
total interest, the assessee paid Rs.4,30,008/- as foreclosure charges on
prepayment of loan to ICICI Bank. The AO did not allow deduction for
this sum in the computation of income under the head 'Income from
house property.' The ld. CIT(A) affirmed the view taken by the AO.
4. I have heard the rival submissions and perused the relevant
material available on record. I find that the issue raised in this appeal is
directly covered by an order passed by the Mumbai Bench of the
Tribunal in Windermere Properties (P) Ltd. Vs. DCIT (2013) 155 TTJ
(Mum) 1. In this case, the Tribunal has held that prepayment charges
made for early disposal of loan are deductible as interest u/s 24(b) in ITA No.691/Del/2014 3
the computation of income under the head 'Income from house
property.' As the facts and circumstances of the instant case are,
mutatis mutandis, similar to those considered and decided by the
Mumbai Bench of the Tribunal, respectfully following the precedent, I
overturn the impugned order and order for the grant of deduction of
foreclosure charges amounting to Rs.4,30,008/- u/s 24(b) in the
computation of income under the head 'Income from house property.'
5. In the result, the appeal is allowed.
The decision was pronounced in the open court on 19th June,
2015.
Sd/-
(R.S. SYAL) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Dated: 19th June, 2015.
dk
Copy forwarded to
1. Appellant
2. Respondent
3. CIT
4. CIT(A)
5. DR Dy. Registrar, ITAT, New Delhi
This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.
Research this judgment with Miss Lucy
Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.
Try Miss Lucy free