Miss Lucy
← All judgments

Startrade Goods (P) Ltd., Kolkata vs Department Of Income Tax

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal22 May 2015

Ratio decidendi

The rule this decision rests on

Where the assessee has produced agreement particulars, confirmations and evidence of the payees' assessment to tax for payments made by cheque, and the company holds a substantial asset whose value supports the price paid for shares, an addition of the excess over the book value as unexplained investment under the Income-tax Act, 1961 is not sustainable, since no provision permits treating such a premium as unexplained investment merely because the price exceeds book value; the Tribunal accordingly confirmed the deletion of the addition and dismissed the revenue's appeal.

Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.

Judgment

As delivered

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL "A" BENCH: KOLKATA [Before Shri P. K. Bansal, AM & Shri Mahavir Singh, JM]

I.T.A No. 567/Kol/2012 Assessment Year: 2007-08 Income-tax Officer, Wd-1(1), Kolkata. Vs. M/s. Startrade Goods (P) Ltd. (PAN: AAJCS8856N) (Appellant) (Respondent)

Date of hearing: 19.05.2015 Date of pronouncement: 22.05.2015

For the Appellant: Shri K. L. Kanak, JCIT, Sr. DR For the Respondent: Shri Amitava Bose, Advocate

ORDER

Per Shri Mahavir Singh, JM:

This appeal by revenue is arising out of order passed by CIT(A)-I, Kolkata vide Appeal No. 387/CIT(A)-I/Wd-1(1)/09-10 dated 05.01.2012. Assessment was framed by ITO, Ward-1(1), Kolkata u/s. 143(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act") for Assessment Year 2007-08 vide his order dated 31.12.2009.

2. This appeal by revenue is filed belatedly by eight days and revenue has filed condonation petition stating the reasons. Ld. Counsel for the assessee has not objected to the Condonation of delay and he has conceded the position. In view of the above and reasons stated in the Condonation petition, we condone the delay and admit the appeal.

3. The only issue in this appeal of revenue is against the order of CIT(A) deleting the addition of unexplained investment of Rs.54,94,400/-. For this, revenue has raised following ground no.1:

"1. That on the facts and circumstances of the case, Ld. CIT(A) erred in deleting the addition of Rs.54,94,400/- on account of unexplained investment despite the fact that assessee company failed to produce the cogent evidences in support of the claim. Further, assessee company failed to justify the purchase of shares at a rate higher than the book value."

4. Briefly stated facts are that the AO during the course of assessment proceedings noticed from the Balance Sheet of the assessee that it had shown investment in the 2 ITA No.567/K/2012 Startrade Goods (P) Ltd.. AY 2007-08

shares of Tivoli Park Apartment Pvt. Ltd. at a sum of Rs.1,02,20,000/- by way of purchase of shares. The AO has extracted the details of purchase of shares as under:

No. of shares Purchased from Cost (Rs.) Remarks of the AO 19054 Todi Brothers as per 74,00,000/- Actual number of shares 19056 @ Rs.100/-

agreement per shares = Rs.19,05,600/-

Balance Rs.74,00,000/- minus Rs.19,05,600/- i.e. Rs.54,94,400/- in form of compensation paid to the share holders from whom it claimed to have purchase the shares.

2000 From Sri Ram Tea Rs.10,20,000/- Purchased on 19.03.2007 @ Rs.510 per Company Pvt. Ltd. share 18000 Direct allotment by Rs.18,00,000/- the company 39054 Total Rs.1,02,20,000/-

From the above, the AO noted that the assessee has purchased shares for a sum of Rs.74,00,000/- from Todi Brothers and for this, the AO required the assessee to file details. The assessee filed copy of agreement dated 06.11.2006 made between Todi Brothers and assessee company for sale of shares. The AO has reproduced the extracts of schedule of payment as against purchase of shares as under:

Part - 1 Details of payment made to be made to Nandalal Todi Name of the shareholder No. of shares Rate (Rs.) Amount (Rs.) Nandalal Todi 2 100/- 200/-

Acme Credit Pvt. Ltd. 200 100/- 20,000/- Rani Leasings and Finance Ltd. 18450 100/- 18,45,200/- Nadia Printing & Packagings Pvt. Ltd. 200 100/- 20,000/- Total : 18852 18,85,200/-

Compensation to Nand Lal Todi 18,14,800/- Total : 37,00,000/- Part-II Details of payment to be made to S. K. Todi Name of the shareholder No. of shares Rate (Rs.) Amount (Rs.) Shrawan Kumar Todi 2 100/- 200/- Calcutta Becon & Engg. Pvt. Ltd. 200 100/- 20,000/- Total : 202 20,200/- Compensation to Shrawan Kumar Todi 18,29,800/- Total:18,50,000/- Part-III

Details of payment to be made to Niranjan Lal Todi 3 ITA No.567/K/2012 Startrade Goods (P) Ltd.. AY 2007-08

Name of the shareholder No. of shares Rate (Rs.) Amount (Rs.) Niranjan Todi 2 100/- 200/-

Compensation to Niranjan Todi 18,49,800/- Total:18,50,000/-

Part-IV

Detail of payment to be made to Gobin Prasad Todi Compensation paid to Gobin Prasad Todi total Rs.18,50,000/-"

5. The AO required the assessee to produce Todi Brothers but only confirmations were filed from these two parties. As the assessee failed to produce Todi Brothers, AO concluded that the assessee failed to justify the real value of shares of Tivoli Park Apartment Pvt. Ltd. and assessee has paid higher value of the shares. According to AO, this compensation or higher value of shares paid in lieu of shares of Tivoli Park Apartment Pvt. Ltd. is unexplained investment amounting to Rs.54,94,400/-. Aggrieved, assessee preferred appeal before CIT(A), who deleted the addition by observing in para 4.4 and 4.5 as under:

"4.4 I have carefully gone through the assessment order and the submissions made by the appellant. The A.O has made the addition of Rs.54,94,400/- being the cost of the shares as unreasonable and as unexplained investment. The appellant has submitted that it had filed the details of purchase, copy of agreement and the income- tax details of the persons from whom shares have been purchased. The payment has been done through cheque and all the recipients are assessed to tax and PAN of all the recipients have been given to the A.a. It was submitted by the appellant that source of the funds were explained to the A.O. The appellant has further submitted that the payment for the purchase of the shares have been done on the basis of the real worth of the assets of the company whose shares have been purchased and there is no justification on the part of the A.O. to treat the amount as unexplained investment, source of which is explained. Aggrieved, revenue came in appeal before us.

4.5 There is substance in the submissions of the appellant, the appellant has made the payment through cheque, the source of which is explained and the recipients are being assessed to tax. Further, the payment were made for the purchase of the shares of the company having substantial value of the property in its balance sheet. Thus, the addition made by the A.O. is without any basis and hence the appellant gets relief on this issue of unexplained investment. The A.O. is directed to delete this addition of Rs.54,94,400/-."

Aggrieved, revenue came in appeal before us.

6. We have heard rival submissions and gone through facts and circumstances of the case. We find that in response to show cause notice the assessee filed explanation dated 4 ITA No.567/K/2012 Startrade Goods (P) Ltd.. AY 2007-08

07.12.2009 and in the said explanation the assessee explaining details of payment made to Todis and also enclosed copies of agreement for purchase of shares of Tivoli Park Apartments Pvt. Ltd. executed on 16.11.2006. The copy of agreement was produced. According to assessee, all the Todis are assessed to income tax and are having following PAN:

"Name PAN Shri Nandlal Todi ABNPT6269L Shri Shraswsan Kumar Todi ABWPT5345P Shri govind Prasad Todi ABNPT6418R"

Ld. Counsel for the assessee before us argued that the AO has framed assessment just on the basis of conjecture and surmises. The AO was of the view that the assessee failed to justify the claim of purchase of shares of Tivoli Park Apartment Pvt. Ltd. as the book value of the company is much lower than the cost of shares as claimed. The assessee explained that it has one asset i.e. land measuring 180 cottahs at prime location of 225, A.J.C. Bose Road, Kolkata valued at Rs.4,35,01,577/-. According to assessee, this is a prime location land and when the company will develop the said land into building and sell them, there will be substantial earnings. Accordingly, the valuation of shares sold by the Company is higher. Even otherwise, there is no provision by virtue of which higher price can be added as unexplained investment reason being the assessee has paid from his capital and there is no explained capital invested for the purchase of shares. We find that the CIT(A) has rightly deleted the addition and we confirm the same. This appeal of revenue is dismissed.

7. In the result, appeal of revenue is dismissed.

8. Order is pronounced in the open court on 22.05.2015.

Sd/- Sd/- (P. K. Bansal) (Mahavir Singh) Accountant Member Judicial Member

Dated : 22nd May, 2015

Jd.(Sr.P.S.) 5 ITA No.567/K/2012 Startrade Goods (P) Ltd.. AY 2007-08

Copy of the order forwarded to:

1. APPELLANT - ITO, Ward-1(1), Kolkata.

2 Respondent - M/s. Startrade Goods (P) Ltd., 16A, Brabourne Road, 9 th floor, Kolkata-700 001. 3. The CIT(A), Kolkata 4. The CIT, Kolkata 5. DR, Kolkata Benches, Kolkata

/True Copy, By order,

Asstt. Registrar.

This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.

Research this judgment with Miss Lucy

Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.

Try Miss Lucy free