Soma Enterprise Ltd vs State Bank Of India
- CitationCompany Appeal (AT) (Ins.) No. 314 of 2019
Ratio decidendi
The rule this decision rests on
The corporate debtor has no right of appeal under Section 61 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code against an order admitting an application under Section 7, as laid down in Innoventive Industries Ltd. v. ICICI Bank, and the appeal is therefore not maintainable at its instance. Where the impugned order has been stayed by the Supreme Court in a pending writ petition, the Tribunal will not interfere with that order while it remains under consideration before the Supreme Court.
Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.
Judgment
As delivered
Present: For Appellant : Mr. Arun Kathpalia, Senior Advocate with Mr. Uttam Datt and Ms. Sonakshi Singh, Advocates
ORDER
29.03.2019 Having heard learned counsel for the appellant and being
satisfied with the grounds, the delay of 11 days in preferring the appeal is
condoned.
I.A. No. 1143 of 2019 stands disposed of.
This appeal has been preferred by the 'Corporate Debtor' - 'Soma
Enterprises Limited' against the order dated 12th February, 2019 whereby an
application under Section 7 of the 'I&B Code' filed by the 'State Bank of India'
has been admitted. However, this appeal is not maintainable at the instance of
the 'Corporate Debtor' in view of the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in
"Innoventive Industries Ltd. v. ICICI Bank", (2018) 1 SCC 407] (Para 11),.
Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the impugned order dated
12th February, 2019 has been stayed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the Writ
Petition (Civil) No. 1411/2018 dated 20th February, 2019 filed by the 'Corporate
Debtor'. In that view of the matter as the impugned order is under consideration -2-
before the Hon'ble Supreme Court, we are not inclined to interfere with the same
apart from the fact that the appeal is not maintainable at the instance of the
'Corporate Debtor'.
The appeals is disposed of with liberty to the shareholder/directors to
challenge the order, if impugned order dated 12th February, 2019 is revived. If
the impugned order dated 12th February, 2019 is revived due to dismissal of the
Writ Petition by the Hon'ble Supreme Court, in such case the period of the
pendency of the case before the Hon'ble Supreme Court may be extended to
count the delay.
[Justice S.J. Mukhopadhaya] Chairperson
[ Justice A.I.S. Cheema ] Member (Judicial)
/ns/sk/
Company Appeal (AT) (Ins.) No. 314 of 2019
This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.
Research this judgment with Miss Lucy
Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.
Try Miss Lucy free