Shyam Sunder Jolly vs Sebi
- CitationAppeal No. 584 of 2021
Ratio decidendi
The rule this decision rests on
An interim injunction or ad-interim order passed as a provisional measure does not decide the lis or adjudicate the violations alleged, and so does not bar the issuance of a show cause notice on the same matter; a show cause notice is therefore not vitiated on the ground that the appellant was already punished for the same violation, where the earlier order was only an interim injunction and a full opportunity to defend will be given in the new proceedings.
Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.
Judgment
As delivered
Date of Decision: 14.09.2021
Appeal No. 584 of 2021
Shyam Sunder Jolly House No. D-2, Kansal Apartments, Ward No. 6, Mehrauli, Near PIR Ki Mazar, Delhi- 110 030 ...Appellant
Versus
Securities and Exchange Board of India, SEBI Bhavan, Plot No. C-4A, G-Block, Bandra-Kurla Complex, Bandra (East), Mumbai- 400 051 ...Respondent
Mr. Amit Gupta, Advocate with Ms. Kapila Mahendroo, Advocate for the Appellant.
Mr. Sumit Rai, Advocate with Mr. Bhushan Shah, Mr. Chirag Shah, Mr. Akash Jain and Ms. Daksha Kasekar, Advocates i/b Mansukhlal Hiralal & Co. for the Respondent.
CORAM: Justice Tarun Agarwala, Presiding Officer Justice M. T. Joshi, Judicial Member
Per: Justice Tarun Agarwala, Presiding Officer (Oral)
1.
The appellant has challenged the show cause notice
dated July 16, 2021 contending that this show cause notice is
bad in law and that the appellant having already been punished 2
for the same violation and therefore such show cause notice for
the same violation cannot be issued.
2. We find that pursuant to a report submitted by the
National Stock Exchange of India Limited an ex-parte ad-
interim order was passed on October 11, 2019 which was
subsequently confirmed on January 24, 2020. Pursuant to the
Forensic Auditors report a show cause notice has now been
issued. We are of the opinion that the ad-interim orders which
was confirmed was only an injunction as an interim measure
and did not decide the lis or the dispute or the violations
committed, if any, by the appellant. Now a show cause notice
has been issued and full opportunity would be given to the
appellant to defend himself.
3. Thus, we do not find any error in the issuance of the
show cause notice. The appeal fails and is dismissed summarily
at the admission stage with no order as to costs.
4. The present matter was heard through video conference
due to Covid-19 pandemic. At this stage it is not possible to sign
a copy of this order nor a certified copy of this order could be
issued by the Registry. In these circumstances, this order will be 3
digitally signed by the Private Secretary on behalf of the bench
and all concerned parties are directed to act on the digitally
signed copy of this order. Parties will act on production of a
digitally signed copy sent by fax and/or email.
Justice Tarun Agarwala Presiding Officer
Justice M. T. Joshi Judicial Member 14.09.2021 RAJALA Digitally by signed
PK KSHMI RAJALAKSHMI NAIR H
Date: 2021.09.15 H NAIR 11:32:59 +05'30'
This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.
Research this judgment with Miss Lucy
Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.
Try Miss Lucy free