Miss Lucy
← All judgments

Shubham Maheshwari vs Sebi

Securities Appellate Tribunal20 January 2023Tarun Agarwala

Ratio decidendi

The rule this decision rests on

The Tribunal's disposal rests on the proposition that where an appellant's case falls within the terms of a settlement scheme framed under the SEBI (Settlement Proceedings) Regulations, 2018, the appeal may be disposed of by directing the appellant to apply for settlement under that scheme within a fixed period, and by directing the authority to treat such an application as filed in a pending proceeding and to pass appropriate orders on it.

Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.

Judgment

As delivered

BEFORE THE SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNALMUMBAI

Date of Decision : 20.01.2023

Misc. Application No. 66 of 2023 And Appeal No. 77 of 2023

Shubham Maheshwari 16-B, Shiv Moti Hardia Nagar, Indore, M. P. - 452 002. ..... Appellant

Versus

Securities & Exchange Board of India SEBI Bhavan, Plot No. C-4A, G Block, Bandra Kurla Complex, Bandra (East), Mumbai - 400 051. ...... Respondent

Mr. B. M. Maheshwari, Advocate for the Appellant.

Mr. Abhiraj Arora, Advocate i/b ELP for the Respondent.

CORAM : Justice Tarun Agarwala, Presiding Officer Ms. Meera Swarup, Technical Member

Per : Justice Tarun Agarwala, Presiding Officer (Oral)

1.

There is a delay in the filing of the appeal. For the reasons

stated in the application, the delay is condoned. Misc. Application is

allowed.

2. We find that the appellant's case is squarely covered by the

SEBI Settlement Scheme 2022 which has been issued in terms of 2

Regulation 26 of Securities and Exchange Board of India (Settlement

Proceedings) Regulations, 2018.

3. In view of the aforesaid, we dispose of the appeal directing

the appellant to file an appropriate application for settlement before

the authority concerned within two weeks from today. If the same is

filed, the authority will accept the settlement application in terms of

the SEBI Settlement Scheme 2022 as an application filed in a

pending proceeding and pass appropriate orders.

4. The appeal is disposed of.

5. This order will be digitally signed by the Private Secretary on

behalf of the bench and all concerned parties are directed to act on

the digitally signed copy of this order. Certified copy of this order is

also available from the Registry on payment of usual charges.

Justice Tarun Agarwala Presiding Officer

Ms. Meera Swarup Technical Member 20.01.2023 PRAMILA Digitally by PRAMILA signed

PTM TANAJI TANAJI MISAL Date: 2023.01.20 MISAL 17:10:54 +05'30'

This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.

Research this judgment with Miss Lucy

Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.

Try Miss Lucy free