Shreyans Realtors Private Limited & Anr vs Saroj Realtors & Developers Private ...
- CitationCompany Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 311 of 2018
Ratio decidendi
The rule this decision rests on
A claimant cannot be treated as a financial creditor under Section 5(7) and (8) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, where the corporate debtor's board resolution shows it never agreed to a loan carrying interest and gave no undertaking to repay with interest within a specified period; in such a case the claimant cannot be said to owe a "financial debt" from the corporate debtor.
Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.
Judgment
As delivered
Shreyans Realtors Private Limited & Anr. ...Appellants
Vs.
Saroj Realtors & Developers Private Limited ...Respondent
Present: For Appellants: - Mr. Chinmoy Pradip Sharma, Mr. Yadvendra Yadav and Mr. Shailesh Kumar Sinha, Advocates.
For Respondent:- Ms. Madhusmita Bora and Mr. Pawan Kishore, Advocates.
ORDER
04.07.2018─ From the record, we find that though the Appellants
by its resolution dated 16th May, 2013 decided to grant unsecured loan
to 'Saroj Realtors and Developers Private Limited' with 24% interest
payable annually and for return of the principal amount along with
interest on or before 31st March, 2016, but the Board of Directors of the
'Corporate Debtor' in their meeting held on 29th March, 2014 decided to
accept the amount as 'interest free unsecured loan'. From the aforesaid
decision of the 'Corporate Debtor', we find that the 'Corporate Debtor'
never accepted to take loan with 24% interest and given no undertaking
to repay the amount with interest within specific period. On the basis of
such evidence, the Appellants cannot claim to owe 'financial debt' from
Contd/-............
-2-
the 'Corporate Debtor' and thereby cannot be claimed to be a 'Financial
Creditor' as defined under Section 5(7) & (8) of the Insolvency and
Bankruptcy Code, 2016.
For the reason aforesaid, we are not inclined to interfere with the
findings of the Adjudicating Authority (National Company Law Tribunal)
as decided by impugned order dated 1st May, 2018. The appeal is
accordingly dismissed. No cost.
(Justice S.J. Mukhopadhaya) Chairperson
(Justice Bansi Lal Bhat) Member(Judicial) Ar/uk
Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 311 of 2018
This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.
Research this judgment with Miss Lucy
Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.
Try Miss Lucy free