Miss Lucy
← All judgments

Shikshadaan Foundation Charitable ... vs Assessee

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal29 May 2015

Ratio decidendi

The rule this decision rests on

The procedure for registration of a trust or institution is governed by section 12AA, and the Commissioner, in deciding an application for registration under section 12A, must examine whether the applicant satisfies the requirements prescribed in section 12AA; a rejection grounded on non-compliance with a rule requiring an audit report in a form not called for by section 12AA cannot stand where the Commissioner has not examined the application against section 12AA, and the matter is to be restored for fresh consideration. Where an application for approval under section 80G(5)(vi) is rejected on the same ground of non-compliance with the same rule, and the same reasoning applies, the order rejecting it is likewise set aside and the application restored to the Commissioner for de novo consideration.

Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.

Judgment

As delivered

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNALDELHI BENCH "G" NEW DELHIBEFORE SHRI S.V. MEHROTRA : ACCOUNTANT MEMBERANDSHRI A.T. VARKEY.: JUDICIAL MEMBERITA no. 2080 & 2081/Del/2015U/s 12A & 80GShikshadaan Foundation Vs. CIT(E), Chandigarh.Charitable TrustC/o Lunawat & Co.,A-2/132, Prateek Apartments,Paschim Vihar, New Delhi.PAN: AALTS 4686 B( Appellant ) (Respondent)Appellant by : Shri Pramod Jain CARespondent by Shri BRR Kumar Sr. DRDate of hearing: 21/05/2015.Date of order : 29-05/2015.ORDERPER S.V. MEHROTRA, A.M..:

These appeals have been preferred by the assessee against separate orders dated 13-3-2015 passed by the CIT(Exemptions), Chandigarh, u/s 12A and 80G of the I.T. Act, 1961.

ITA no. 2080/Del/2015:

2. The assessee had filed application for registration of trust in form no.

10A in the office of CIT, Faridabad, which was transferred to 2

CIT(Exemptions), Chandigarh.. Ld. CIT(Exemptions) rejected the assessee's application on the ground that assessee had not complied with Rule 17B, which required the assessee to furnish the audit report in form no. 10B.

3. Ld. counsel for the assessee submitted that there is no requirement of furnishing audit report u/s 12AA, which prescribes the procedure for registration.

4. Having heard both the parties we find considerable force in the submissions of ld. counsel for the assessee because the procedure for registration of a trust or institution has been prescribed u/s 12AA and only when the registration is granted, the assessee becomes eligible for exemption u/s 11. At the time of grant of registration the ld. CIT is required to examine whether the assessee trust fulfills the mandate prescribed u/s 12AA or not. Since the ld. CIT(E) has not examined the application, having regard to section 12AA, we set aside the order of ld. CIT(E) and restore the matter back to his file for de novo consideration.

ITA no. 2081/Del/2015:

5.Similarly, assessee had filed application in form 10G for grant of approval u/s 80G(5)(vi) in the office of CIT, Faridabad, which was transferred to CIT(Exemptions), Chandigarh. Ld. CIT(Exemptions) rejected the assessee's application on the ground that assessee had not complied with Rule 17B, which required the assessee to furnish the audit report in form no. 10A.

3 6. On similar facts, in assessee's appeal for registration u/s 12A, we have restored the matter to the file of ld. CIT(E) for decision afresh. Therefore, for the very same reasons herein also we set aside the order of ld. CIT(E) and restore the matter back to his file for de novo consideration of assessee's application for grant of approval u/s 80G(5)(vi) of the I.T. Act.

7. In the result, both the appeals stand allowed for statistical purposes only.

Order pronounced in open court on 29/05/2015..

Sd/- Sd/- (A.T. VARKEY. ) (S.V. MEHROTRA) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Dated: 29/05/2015. *MP* Copy of order to: 1. Assessee 2. AO 3. CIT 4. CIT(A) 5. DR, ITAT, New Delhi.

This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.

Research this judgment with Miss Lucy

Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.

Try Miss Lucy free