Sheena Adarsh vs Union Bank Of India & Anr
- CitationCompany Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 690 of 2018
Ratio decidendi
The rule this decision rests on
Where a corporate debtor has in fact been given notice of an application under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 and has appeared through counsel who are heard before admission, the contention that the application was admitted without notice to the corporate debtor cannot be sustained. Operational creditors, whose claims are to be considered by the Resolution Professional once the corporate insolvency resolution process has been initiated, have no right to be heard at the stage of admission of an application under Section 7 of the Code.
Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.
Judgment
As delivered
Union Bank of India & Anr. ...Respondents
With Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No.742 of 2018
IN THE MATTER OF:
Mr. Sheeju Purushothaman ...Appellant
Versus
Union Bank of India & Anr. ...Respondents
For Appellant : Mr. Baalaji, Mr. Teack Raj, Mr. Karuppaiah Meyyappan Advocates
For Respondent : Mr. Avrojyoti Chatterjee, Mr. Rajiv S. Joy, Mr. Abhijit Roy and Ms. Jayasree Sama Advocates for Respondent No. 1
ORDER
29.03.2019 These appeals have been preferred by the Appellants -
Shareholders against the order dated 1st November, 2018 passed by the
Adjudicating Authority (National Company Law Tribunal) Chennai Bench,
Chennai admitting the application under Section 7 of the Insolvency and
Bankruptcy Code, 2016 ("I&B Code" for short) filed by the Respondent -
'Union Bank of India'- ('Financial Creditor'). 2
2. Learned counsel for the Appellants submitted that the 'Corporate
Debtor' is a Public Limited Company and there are about 24000 shareholders
apart from the employees about 2000 families are dependent on the 'Corporate
Debtor'. It is also submitted that the Adjudicating Authority admitted the
application without notice to the 'Corporate Debtor'.
3. However, the aforesaid submissions cannot be accepted as admittedly
notice was issued to the 'Corporate Debtor' and the Senior Advocate along
with another Advocate appeared on behalf of the 'Corporate Debtor' and they
were heard.
4. Learned counsel for the Respondents submits that the counsel for the
'Corporate Debtor' appeared on eleven occasions before the Adjudicating
Authority thereafter on hearing them the order was passed.
5. So far as the claims of the 'Operational Creditors' are concerned, their
claim will be considered by the 'Resolution Professional' once admitted.
Otherwise, they have no right to be heard at the time of admission of the
application under Section 7 of the 'I&B Code'.
6. For the reasons aforesaid, we are not inclined to interfere with the
impugned order dated 1st November, 2018. The Adjudicating Authority is
expected to complete the 'Resolution Process' in accordance with law within
the stipulated period. The 'Resolution Professional', the 'Committee of
Creditors' will co-operate to ensure that the resolution process succeeds.
Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 690 & 742 of 2018 3
Both the appeals stand disposed of with aforesaid observations and
directions. No cost.
[Justice S.J. Mukhopadhaya] Chairperson
[Justice A.I.S. Cheema] Member (Judicial)
/ns/sk/
Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 690 & 742 of 2018
This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.
Research this judgment with Miss Lucy
Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.
Try Miss Lucy free