Shashi Kanth Jain vs Alloys & Metals (India)
- CitationCompany Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 373 of 2018
Ratio decidendi
The rule this decision rests on
Where the corporate debtor has not disputed, in its reply to the demand notice under Section 8(1) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, the amount claimed by an operational creditor, and the record shows that the debt is payable by the corporate debtor and that the default has occurred, the Adjudicating Authority is not required to hold the account of the operational creditor unresolved before admitting an application under Section 9; an unadjudicated state of the accounts is not, by itself, a ground to set aside an order admitting such an application. A challenge to the genuineness of documents that was never raised before the Adjudicating Authority cannot be entertained for the first time in appeal, and does not on its own vitiate an admission order.
Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.
Judgment
As delivered
Shashi Kanth Jain ...Appellant Versus M/s. Alloys & Metals (India) ...Respondent Present: For Appellant : Ms. Poonam Agarwal, Mr. Dilip Agarwal and Ms. Rachna Singh, Advocates
For Respondent : Mr. Sumant Batra, Ms. Srishti Kapoor and Ms. Priyanka Anand, Advocates Mr. Vivek Sibal and Mr. Yash Patel, Advocate for R.P.
ORDER
08.01.2019 This appeal has been preferred by the appellant - 'Mr. Shashi
Kanth Jain', Director of 'Hindustan Paper Corporation Ltd.' (Corporate Debtor)
against the order dated 13th June, 2018 passed by the Adjudicating Authority
(National Company Law Tribunal) New Delhi Bench whereby and whereunder
the application under Section 9 of the 'I&B Code' preferred by 'M/s. Alloys &
Metals (India)' has been admitted, order of moratorium has been passed and the
'Resolution Professional' has been appointed.
2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant submits that the
Adjudicating Authority had not provided sufficient opportunity to the 'corporate
debtor' to file reply though the notice was issued to the 'corporate debtor' and
after hearing the parties, the impugned order was passed. One Mr. Dilip
Agarwal, Advocate appears on behalf of the 'corporate debtor' and raised all the
objections.
2
3. It is next contended that many of the documents were not proper or
fabricated but such objection was not raised by the 'corporate debtor' before the
Adjudicating Authority. On the other hand from the record we find that the
Demand Notice under Section 8(1) of the I&B Code, the 'corporate debtor' has
not disputed the amount claimed by the 'operational creditors' .
4. Learned counsel for the appellant submitted that the accounts have not
yet been considered but that cannot be a ground to set aside the order.
5. In "Innoventive Industries Ltd. v. ICICI Bank, (2018) - (2018) 1 SCC
407] (Civil Appeals Nos. 8337-38 of 2017)" wherein the Hon'ble Supreme
Court has held :
"20. Under Section 4 of the Code, Part II applies to
matters relating to the insolvency and liquidation
of corporate debtors, where the minimum amount
of default is rupees one lakh. Sections 6, 7 and 8
form part of one scheme and are very important for
the decision in the present case. They read as
follows:
"6. Persons who may initiate corporate
insolvency resolution process.--Where
any corporate debtor commits a default, a
financial creditor, an operational creditor or
the corporate debtor itself may initiate
corporate insolvency resolution process in
Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 373 of 2018 3
respect of such corporate debtor in the
manner as provided under this Chapter.
7. Initiation of corporate insolvency
resolution process by financial
creditor.--(1) A financial creditor either by
itself or jointly with other financial creditors
may file an application for initiating
corporate insolvency resolution process
against a corporate debtor before the
adjudicating authority when a default has
occurred.
Explanation.--For the purposes of this sub-section,
a default includes a default in respect of a
financial debt owed not only to the applicant
financial creditor but to any other financial creditor
of the corporate debtor.
(2) The financial creditor shall make an application
under sub-section (1) in such form and manner and
accompanied with such fee as may be prescribed.
(3) The financial creditor shall, along with the
application furnish--
(a) record of the default recorded with the
information utility or such other record or
evidence of default as may be specified;
Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 373 of 2018 4
(b) the name of the resolution professional
proposed to act as an interim resolution
professional; and
(c) any other information as may be specified
by the Board.
(4) The adjudicating authority shall, within fourteen
days of the receipt of the application under sub-
section (2), ascertain the existence of a default
from the records of an information utility or on the
basis of other evidence furnished by the financial
creditor under sub-section (3).
(5) Where the adjudicating authority is satisfied
that--
(a) a default has occurred and the application
under sub-section (2) is complete, and there is no
disciplinary proceedings pending against the
proposed resolution professional, it may, by order,
admit such application;
or
(b) default has not occurred or the application
under sub-section (2) is incomplete or any
disciplinary proceeding is pending against the
proposed resolution professional, it may, by order,
reject such application:
Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 373 of 2018 5
Provided that the adjudicating authority shall,
before rejecting the application under clause (b) of
sub-section (5), give a notice to the applicant to
rectify the defect in his application within seven
days of receipt of such notice from the adjudicating
authority.
(6) The corporate insolvency resolution process shall
commence from the date of admission of the
application under sub-section (5).
(7) The adjudicating authority shall communicate--
(a) the order under clause (a) of sub-section (5) to
the financial creditor and the corporate debtor;
(b) the order under clause (b) of sub-section (5) to
the financial creditor, within seven days of
admission or rejection of such application, as the
case may be.
8. Insolvency resolution by operational
creditor.--(1) An operational creditor may, on the
occurrence of a default, deliver a demand notice of
unpaid operational debtor copy of an invoice
demanding payment of the amount involved in the
default to the corporate debtor in such form and
manner as may be prescribed.
(2) The corporate debtor shall, within a period of ten
days of the receipt of the demand notice or copy of
Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 373 of 2018 6
the invoice mentioned in sub-section (1) bring to the
notice of the operational creditor--
(a) existence of a dispute, if any, and record of the
pendency of the suit or arbitration proceedings
filed before the receipt of such notice or invoice in
relation to such dispute;
(b) the repayment of unpaid operational debt--
(i) by sending an attested copy of the record of
electronic transfer of the unpaid amount from the
bank account of the corporate debtor; or
(ii) by sending an attested copy of record that the
operational creditor has encashed a cheque issued by
the corporate debtor.
Explanation.--For the purposes of this section, a
"demand notice" means a notice served by an
operational creditor to the corporate debtor
demanding repayment of the operational debt in
respect of which the default has occurred."
21. Section 12 provides for a time-limit for completion
of the insolvency resolution process and reads as
follows:
"12. Time-limit for completion of insolvency
resolution process.--(1) Subject to sub-section
(2), the corporate insolvency resolution process
Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 373 of 2018 7
shall be completed within a period of one hundred
and eighty days from the date of admission of the
application to initiate such process.
(2) The resolution professional shall file an
application to the adjudicating authority to extend
the period of the corporate insolvency resolution
process beyond one hundred and eighty days, if
instructed to do so by a resolution passed at a
meeting of the committee of creditors by a vote of
seventy-five per cent of the voting shares.
(3) On receipt of an application under sub-
section (2), if the adjudicating authority is satisfied
that the subject-matter of the case is such that
corporate insolvency resolution process cannot be
completed within one hundred and eighty days, it
may by order extend the duration of such process
beyond one hundred and eighty days by such
further period as it thinks fit, but not exceeding
ninety days:
Provided that any extension of the period of
corporate insolvency resolution process under this
section shall not be granted more than once."
29. The scheme of Section 7 stands in contrast with
the scheme under Section 8 where an operational
creditor is, on the occurrence of a default, to first
Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 373 of 2018 8
deliver a demand notice of the unpaid debt to the
operational debtor in the manner provided in
Section 8(1) of the Code. Under Section 8(2), the
corporate debtor can, within a period of 10 days of
receipt of the demand notice or copy of the invoice
mentioned in sub-section (1), bring to the notice of
the operational creditor the existence of a dispute
or the record of the pendency of a suit or arbitration
proceedings, which is pre-existing--i.e. before
such notice or invoice was received by the
corporate debtor. The moment there is existence of
such a dispute, the operational creditor gets out of
the clutches of the Code."
6. It is not in dispute that the 'debt' is payable by the 'corporate debtor'
and the 'corporate debtor' is defaulted in payment of the 'debt' and the records
were complete, we find no ground to interfere with the impugned order.
7. In absence of any merit, the appeal is dismissed. No cost.
[Justice S.J. Mukhopadhaya] Chairperson
[ Justice Bansi Lal Bhat ] Member (Judicial)
/ns/sk/
Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 373 of 2018
This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.
Research this judgment with Miss Lucy
Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.
Try Miss Lucy free