Sh. Guru Hargobind Sahib Charitable ... vs Assessee
- CitationITA No. 1083/Chd/2014
Ratio decidendi
The rule this decision rests on
On an application for registration under section 12AA, the Commissioner of Income Tax must himself satisfy himself, on receipt of the application, as to the objects of the trust or institution and the genuineness of its activities before granting or rejecting registration; findings on both issues are required, and enquiries conducted by subordinate income tax officers in other proceedings do not discharge that obligation. A rejection of a section 12AA application that proceeds on the assertion that required details have not been furnished, without considering the material already on record and without findings on the objects and genuineness of activities, is unsustainable, and the matter must be restored to the Commissioner for fresh decision on merits after affording reasonable opportunity of being heard. Allegations of misuse of a society's funds are not a matter for the Commissioner to determine at the stage of granting registration under section 12AA; such questions fall within the domain of regular assessment by the Assessing Officer.
Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.
Judgment
As delivered
Sh.Guru Hargobind Sahib Charitable Trust, Vs. The C.I.T-III, Opposite Ludhiana Hospital, Ludhiana. Village Kothe Bhaggu, Jagaron. PAN: AACTS9358K (Appellant) (Respondent)
Appellant by : Shri Ashwani Kumar Respondent by : Smt.Jyoti Kumari, DR
Date of hearing : 16.03.2015 Date of Pronouncement : 16.03.2015
O R D E R
Per BHAVNESH SAINI, J.M. :
This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against
the order of learned Commissioner of Income Tax-III,
Ludhiana dated 14/17.11.2014 rejecting the application
under section 12AA of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
2. Briefly, the facts are that the assessee trust filed
application for registration under section 12AA of the Act
before the learned Commissioner of Income Tax in prescribed
form. The main objects of the assessee are running of
educational association in the name of GHG academy, the said
school running classes from nursery to 10+2. Another school 2
is also purchased. The application was forwarded to the
Assessing Officer and the Assessing Officer sent his report
dated 25.8.2014. In order to satisfy the conditions necessary
for registration, a questionnaire dated 29.8.2014 was issued
enclosing therewith the report of the Assessing Officer for
assessee's comments requiring to furnish information. The
proceedings were not attended to by the assessee. Further
questionnaire was issued on 26.9.2014 seeking reply of the
assessee. On 2.10.2014 the assessee filed written reply.
According to the learned Commissioner of Income Tax, the
assessee did not controvert the report of the Assessing
Officer. Therefore, the learned Commissioner of Income Tax
was of the view that the assessee did not perform the
activities of the society as per the aims and objects of the
trust deed. According to the learned Commissioner of Income
Tax, the assessee did not offer any explanation with regard to
the misuse of the society's funds. In the absence of the
required information/details, verification of the facts cannot
be carried out. Therefore, the registration application under
section 12AA of the Act was rejected.
3. We have heard the learned representatives of both the
parties and perused the material available on record. The
assessee in the Paper Book filed the copies of the notices
issued by the I.T.O.-IV, Moga, Head Quarter Jagraon seeking
various details from the assessee and the assessee in
response thereto, filed reply alongwith documents on
17.7.2014 and 19.8.2014. The assessee also filed copy of the 3
letter issued by the I.T.O.-IV, Head Quarter (Judicial) dated
29.8.2014 seeking several queries from the assessee, which
was replied to by the assessee on 2.10.2014. The learned
counsel for assessee referring to these documents submitted
that complete information and details were furnished before
the I.T.O.-IV, Moga, Head Quarters Jagraon as well as before
the I.T.O. Head Quarters (Judicial). Therefore, the findings of
the learned Commissioner of Income Tax are incorrect that no
complete details/information have been provided.
Considering the above documents on record, we are of the
view that the assessee has filed required details before the
I.T.O.-IV, Moga, Head Quarters Jagraon as well as before the
I.T.O. Head Quarters (Judicial). Therefore, it was the duty of
the learned Commissioner of Income Tax to consider the
material on record and should have given findings of fact on
merits instead of rejecting the application of the assessee by
stating that no required details are filed on record.
According to section 12AA of the Act, the Commissioner of
Income Tax on receipt of the registration application should
have satisfied himself about the objects of the trust or
institution and genuineness of its activities before granting
registration or rejecting the registration application.
However, no such findings have been given on both the issues.
Further it appears from the notices issued by the I.T.O.-IV,
Moga, Head Quarters Jagraon and I.T.O. Head Quarters
(Judicial) enquiries have been conducted by the I.T.O.-IV,
Moga, Head Quarters Jagraon and I.T.O. Head Quarters
(Judicial). The requirement of law is that the enquiries 4
should have been conducted by the learned Commissioner of
Income Tax himself on registration application and he should
have satisfied himself about the objects of the trust or
institution and the genuineness of its activities. It appears
that no such enquiries have been conducted by the learned
Commissioner of Income Tax and no documents furnished by
the assessee have been taken into consideration. The issue
on misuse of society's funds is not within the domain of the
learned Commissioner of Income Tax to be considered at the
stage of grant of registration to the assessee. It is a matter
of regular assessment to be considered by the Assessing
Officer. It, therefore, appears that in the absence of proper
enquiry into the matter as per the requirement of section
12AA of the Act by the learned Commissioner of Income Tax,
the matter requires reconsideration at the level of learned
Commissioner of Income Tax-III, Ludhiana.
4. In view of the above discussion, we set aside the
impugned order and restore the matter in issue to the file of
the learned Commissioner of Income Tax-III, Ludhiana with
direction to redecide the registration application of the
assessee in accordance with law by following the provisions of
section 12AA of the Act strictly and the learned Commissioner
of Income Tax shall decide the registration application on
merits after giving reasonable sufficient opportunity of being
heard to the assessee. The learned Commissioner of Income
Tax shall decide the matter within one month from receipt of
this order.
5
5 In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is
allowed for statistical purposes.
Order pronounced in the open court on this 16th day of
March, 2015.
Sd/- Sd/- (T.R.SOOD) (BHAVNESH SAINI) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER
Dated : 16 t h March, 2015
*Rati*
Copy to: The Appellant/The Respondent/The CIT(A)/The CIT/The DR.
Assistant Registrar, ITAT, Chandigarh
This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.
Research this judgment with Miss Lucy
Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.
Try Miss Lucy free