Miss Lucy
← All judgments

Sgz & Sga Sugars (Jv) Limited vs Sangli District Central Co-Operative ...

National Company Law Appellate Tribunal26 May 2023Ashok Bhushan

Ratio decidendi

The rule this decision rests on

The Adjudicating Authority's grant of leave to amend the date of default in Form 1 does not foreclose the corporate debtor from contesting, in its reply, the date of default on which the application is founded; the amendment does not preclude the appellant from raising that plea. The appeal against the amendment order is disposed of on that footing, without the Appellate Tribunal entertaining it further, because no useful purpose would be served by doing so.

Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.

Judgment

As delivered

NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNALPRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHICompany Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 704 of 2023&I.A. No. 2341 of 2023

IN THE MATTER OF: SGZ & SGA Sugars (JV) Ltd. ...Appellant

Versus

Sangli District Central Co-operative Bank Ltd. ...Respondent

Present: For Appellant : Mr. Abhijit Sinha, Mr. ANV Patel, Mr. Siddhant Buxy, Mr. Harshad Vyas and Mr. Aditya Shukla, Advocates

For Respondent : None

ORDER

26.05.2023 Heard Learned Counsel for the Appellant.

This Appeal has been filed against the impugned order dated

17.04.2023 by which the Adjudicating Authority has allowed the Financial

Creditor to amend the date of default as mentioned in Form -1. Counsel for

the Appellant submits that earlier date was mentioned as 17.01.2021 which

has now been amended as 19.04.2021. It is submitted that as per date of

default, the application was barred by Section 10A.

We have heard the Counsel for the Appellant and perused the record.

The Appellant has been granted time to file a reply. Appellant in Reply

is entitled to raise plea regarding date of default on basis of which application

is filed and the amendment shall not preclude the appellant in raising the

plea in the reply.

We thus are of the view that no useful purpose shall be served in

entertaining the appeal. With the aforesaid observations and clarifications, we

dispose of the appeal. Learned Counsel for the Appellant may file his Reply

within 4 weeks before the Adjudicating Authority.

[Justice Ashok Bhushan] Chairperson

[Mr. Barun Mitra] Member (Technical)

pks/nn

Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 704 of 2023 2 of 2

This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.

Research this judgment with Miss Lucy

Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.

Try Miss Lucy free