Satish Kumar, Delhi vs Assessee
- CitationI.T.A.No.1181/Del/2011
Ratio decidendi
The rule this decision rests on
The Tribunal may dismiss an appeal in limine, without deciding it on the merits, where the appellant, having repeatedly obtained adjournments, fails to appear or seek a further adjournment on the date of hearing, from which the Tribunal infers that the assessee is no longer interested in pursuing the appeal.
Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.
Judgment
As delivered
Satish Kumar, vs. ACIT, 1170, Kucha Mahajani, Central Circle -12, E-2, Chandni Chowk, ARA Centre, Delhi. Jhandewalan Extn., AAEPK9645B New Delhi. (Appellant) (Respondent)
Appellant by : None Respondent by : Sh. Ramesh Chandra, CIT DR
Date of Hearing: 23.2.2015 Date of Pronouncement: 04.03.2015
ORDER
PER SH. G.C. GUPTA, VICE PRESIDENT
This appeal by the assessee for the A.Y. 2003-04 is directed against
the order of CIT(A).
2. At the time of hearing none appeared on behalf of the assessee
(Appellant). On previous occasions also the case was adjourned at the
request of the assessee's counsel. The first hearing in this appeal of the
assessee was on 27/09/2011 and was adjourned number of times. Today at
the time of hearing of this appeal no adjournment application was preferred 2
by the assessee. In the facts, we are of the view that the assessee is not
interested in pursuing its appeal before the Tribunal. Accordingly, in
accordance with the ratio of Delhi Tribunal in CIT vs. Multiplan (India) Pvt.
Ltd., 38 ITD 320 (Del); and Late Tukoji Rao Holkar, 223 ITR 480 (MP), we
dismissed the appeal of the assessee in limine as un-admitted.
3. In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed.
4. This decision was pronounced in the Open Court on 4th March, 2015.
Sd/- Sd/- (T.S. KAPOOR) (G.C. GUPTA) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER VICE PRESIDENT
Dated: *Kavita, P.S
Copy forwarded to:-
1. Appellant 2. Respondent 3. CIT 4. CIT(A) 5. DR TRUE COPY By Order
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR 3
Sl. Description Date No. 1. Date of dictation by the Author 23.02.2015 2. Draft placed before the Dictating Member 23.02.2015
3. Draft placed before the Second Member
4. Draft approved by the Second Member
5. Date of approved order comes to the Sr. PS
6. Date of pronouncement of order
7. Date of file sent to the Bench Clerk
8. Date on which file goes to the Head Clerk
9. Date of dispatch of order
This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.
Research this judgment with Miss Lucy
Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.
Try Miss Lucy free