Satendra Singh vs State Of U.P. And 2 Others
- Neutral2026:AHC:105932
Ratio decidendi
The rule this decision rests on
Where a person against whom coercive proceedings are being taken for non-payment of court-awarded maintenance deposits the entire arrears in installments as fixed by the court and continues to pay monthly maintenance as awarded, the court may set aside an ex parte judgment and subsequent coercive proceedings under Section 147 BNSS, conditional upon compliance with the payment schedule and continued performance of maintenance obligations. Where a person fails to comply with the conditions imposed for setting aside coercive proceedings—including deposit of arrears within the specified time, payment of current monthly maintenance, or appearance before the court as required—the protection granted by the court shall be automatically vacated and the court concerned shall proceed against such person in accordance with law.
Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.
Judgment
As delivered
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material brought on record.
2. This application under Section 528 BNSS has been filed by the applicant (husband) against for quashing of entire proceeding of recovery suit being Case No. 98 of 2025 (Smt. Madhu Vs. Satendra Singh), under Section 147 BNSS, Police Station Nidhauli Kalan, District Etah.
3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that monthly maintenance of Rs. 5,000/- per month has been awarded exparte from the date of application in favour of the opposite party No. 2 (wife), and her minor child, without considering the income of the applicant. Learned counsel for the applicant further submits that the opposite party no.2 has deserted the applicant and that the applicant tried his level best to bring her back but all in vain. He further submits that the opposite party No. 2 instead of living with the applicant, had filed an application under Section 125 Cr.P.C. which has been allowed by the learned Family Court vide exparte vide judgment and order dated 16.01.2025, by which the applicant was directed to pay exorbitant amount of maintenance to the private opposite parties without considering the income of the applicant. He further submits that since the proceedings were initiated exparte against the applicant, thus the applicant was not aware of the same, therefore, the proceedings under Section 147 BNSS initiated against the applicant is liable to be quashed.
4. Learned A.G.A. for the State has opposed the prayer and has argued that the learned Family Court had issued notice to the applicant, inspite of the same, he did not appear due to which, the Family Court was left with no option but to proceed exparte against the applicant. With the passage of time when the applicant has not maid any monthly maintenance amount to the opposite party No. 2, she has initiated the present proceeding under Section 147 BNSS for recovery of due arrears of amount, which proceeding needs no interference by this Court.
5. Learned counsel for the applicant further submits that the applicant is ready to pay two lakh rupees out of the due amount towards arrears of maintenance as has been awarded by the learned Family Court and he also agrees to pay monthly maintenance amount to opposite party No. 2 as awarded, provided some indulgence may be granted and the matter may be remitted to the concerned Family Court to consider and decide the application under Section 125 Cr.P.C. afresh. He further submits that the applicant undertakes that he will appear on and each and every date before the court concerned and shall cooperate in the conclusion of the proceedings.
6. Considering the submissions advanced by learned counsel for the parties as well as the fact that the impugned order has been passed without participation of the applicant in the proceedings of Section 125 Cr.P.C. and the recovery proceeding has also been initiated against him, this Court is of the view, that in interest of justice, one last opportunity may be granted to applicant to participate in the proceedings. Accordingly, present application under Section 528 BNSS is disposed of in the following terms.
(A) Subject to applicant depositing entire due amount towards the arrears of maintenance as on date in four equal installments, of which the first installment shall be paid on or before 07.06.2026, the second installment shall be paid on or before 07.07.2026, the third installment shall be paid on or before 07.08.2026 and the last installment shall be paid on or before 07.09.2026, respectively, and continuing to pay monthly maintenance as awarded by the Court below by 15th day of each calendar month starting from May, 2026, the impugned exparte judgement and order dated 02.06.2023 as well as subsequent proceedings under Section 147 BNSS shall stand set aside.
(B) After deposit of the first installment, the concerned Family Court shall proceed to consider and decide the matter afresh in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of three months, if possible, on day today basis, in view of the settled law as laid down by Hon'ble Apex Court in the matter of Rajnesh Vs. Neha and another reported in 2021 (2) SCC 324.
(C) The amount so deposited by the applicant shall be paid over to the opposite party no.2 after due verification by the concerned Court.
(D) In case, the applicant deposits the aforesaid amount within the aforesaid period, no coercive action shall be taken against him.
(E) It goes without saying that in case the applicant fails to deposit the aforesaid amount within the time specified as above or fails to comply with any part of this order or fails to appear before the court concerned on the date fixed, except with prior permission of the Court, the protection granted by this Court shall automatically stand vacated and the court concerned will be at liberty to proceed against him in accordance with law.
7. The Registrar (Compliance) is directed to communicate the order passed by this Court to the concerned Family Court.
(Dr. Gautam Chowdhary,J.)
May 7, 2026
Mustaqeem.
This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.
Research this judgment with Miss Lucy
Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.
Try Miss Lucy free