Sarang Bhand vs West Coast Ventures (India) Pvt. Ltd. & ...
- CitationCompany Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 746 of 2018
Ratio decidendi
The rule this decision rests on
A party that has advanced money to a third-party company, or invested in the equity of a third party, and has not itself advanced any financial debt to the corporate debtor, is not a "financial creditor" of that corporate debtor within the meaning of Section 5(7) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016; accordingly, an application under Section 7 filed on that basis is not maintainable and must be dismissed.
Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.
Judgment
As delivered
Sarang Bhand ...Appellant
Versus
West Coast Ventures (India) Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. ...Respondents
Present:
For Appellant : Mr. Ameya Gokhale, Mr. Saurabh Jain, Ms. Jasveen Kaur, Mr. Vijayant Paliwal and Mr. Shantanu Chaturvedi, Advocates
ORDER
08.02.2019 The respondent - 'West Coast Ventures (India) Private Limited'
(Operational Creditor) filed an application under Section 7 of the Insolvency and
Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (for short, 'I&B Code') for initiation of 'corporate
insolvency resolution process' against 'Organic Recycling Systems Pvt. Ltd.'
(Corporate Debtor). The application having admitted by the Adjudicating
Authority (National Company Law Tribunal), Mumbai Bench by order dated 30th
August, 2018, the present appeal has been preferred by the shareholder of the
'Corporate Debtor'. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant
submitted that the application under Section 7 was filed on 28th September,
2017. The case was heard on the question whether the respondent is a 'financial
creditor' or not and thereafter the impugned order was passed on 30th August,
2018. This order has not been even shown on the website and certified copy of
the impugned order was received by the 'Corporate Debtor' on 20th November, 2
2018. Learned counsel for the appellant submitted that the main issue whether
the respondent can be termed to be a 'financial creditor' within the meaning of
Section 5(7) of the I&B Code has not appropriately considered. Learned counsel
submits that 'West Coast Ventures (India) Pvt. Ltd.' (so called Financial Creditor)
formed a joint venture with M/s. Organic Recycling Systems Pvt. Ltd. (Corporate
Debtor) for project to project basis. Both the parties desired to bid, execute and
operate various municipal solid waste to Energy Project in consortium with each
other.
Notice was issued on the respondent but initially returned unserved with
note that 'the addressee (Financial Creditor) has left the place". Notice on the
'Corporate Debtor' has been served. It was in this background we directed the
appellant to make paper publication in newspapers one English ('Indian Express'
Bengaluru Edition) and another Kannada ('('Udayavani' Bengaluru Edition)
intimating them that 8th February, 2019at 10.30 A.M. is the next date fixed for
admission and the appeal may be disposed of at the stage of admission. In spite
of service of notice through newspaper, the respondent - West Coast Ventures
(India) Pvt. Ltd. has not appeared. It is informed that the 'Resolution
Professional' as was appointed has not taken over the 'corporate debtor',
therefore we find that the 'corporate debtor and the 'Resolution Professional' in
spite of service not appeared.
2. From the record we find that 'memorandum of understanding' dated 10th
November, 2014 was executed between the 'corporate debtor and the respondent
'West Coast Ventures (India) Pvt. Ltd.' for funding of Rs. 43 crores from time to
time as per timeline mentioned therein. Such funding were to be made eventual
investment in the SPVs for Pune and Bangalore Municipal Solid Waste to Energy
Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 746 of 2018 3
Projects. SPV for Bangalore Project with Organic Waste India Private Limited
was already in existence as on the date of the 'MOU' and the SPV for the Pune
Project namely Pune Urban Recyclers Pvt. Ltd. was incorporated on 9th January,
2015. In terms of the 'Memorandum of Understanding' between the parties, the
respondent also invested a joint venture company for execution of the project.
Thus, we find that both the 'corporate debtor' and the respondent 'West Coast
Ventures (India) Private Limited' invested money for the purpose of projects of
equity share of third party and, therefore, it cannot be held that the respondent
'West Coast Ventures (India) Private Limited' invested in the company namely
'M/s. Organic Recycling Systems Pvt. Ltd.' (Corporate Debtor) and thereby 'West
Coast Ventures (India) Private Limited' cannot be termed to be a 'financial
creditor' of M/s. Organic Recycling systems Pvt. Ltd. (Corporate Debtor). The
Adjudicating Authority though noticed that such investments were made for
purchase of equity share of 3rd party but failed to consider the real issue whether
the respondent 'West Coast Ventures (India) Private Limited' can be termed to be
a 'financial creditor' of 'Organic Recycling Systems Pvt. Ltd.' (Corporate Debtor).
3. In view of the observations aforesaid, we hold that an application under
Section 7 filed by 'West Coast Ventures (India) Private Limited' against 'Organic
Recycling systems Pvt. Ltd.' (Corporate Debtor) was not maintainable. The
impugned order dated 30th August, 2018 is accordingly set aside.
4. In effect, order (s) passed by Ld. Adjudicating Authority appointing 'Interim
Resolution Professional', declaring moratorium, freezing of account and all other
order (s) passed by Adjudicating Authority pursuant to impugned order and
action taken by the 'Resolution Professional', including the advertisement
published in the newspaper calling for applications all such orders and actions
Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 746 of 2018 4
are declared illegal and are set aside. The application preferred by the 1st
Respondent under Section 7 of the I&B Code is dismissed. The Adjudicating
Authority will now close the proceeding. The 2nd Respondent Company is
released from all the rigour of law and is allowed to function independently
through its Board of Directors from immediate effect.
5. The Adjudicating Authority will fix the fee of 'Interim Resolution
Professional' and 'Organic Recycling Systems Pvt. Ltd.' (2nd Respondent) will pay
the fees for the period he has functioned. The appeal is allowed with aforesaid
observation and direction. However, in the facts and circumstances of the case,
there shall be no order as to cost.
[Justice S.J. Mukhopadhaya] Chairperson
[ Justice Bansi Lal Bhat ] Member (Judicial)
/ns/sk/
Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 746 of 2018
This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.
Research this judgment with Miss Lucy
Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.
Try Miss Lucy free