Sar Parivahan Private Limited vs Hindustan Paper Corporation Limited
- CitationComp. App. (AT) (Insolvency) No. 152 of 2022
Ratio decidendi
The rule this decision rests on
A party's time to appeal under Section 42 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 runs from the date on which its claim is first rejected, in whole or in part, by the liquidator; the limitation period is not extended by the later uploading of the list of stakeholders where that list reflects the same admitted figure already communicated. A communication from the liquidator which admits a claim for a lesser sum than that claimed is an order rejecting the balance of the claim, and so gives rise to a cause of action for appeal from its date; a query or confirmation sought between the parties as to the admitted amount does not render that communication non-final where the final list retains the same admitted figure and the liquidation order is not modified in substance. The Supreme Court's suo motu extension of limitation during the pandemic does not revive or extend a limitation period which expired before the date specified in that order.
Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.
Judgment
As delivered
Sar Parivahan Pvt. Ltd. ....Appellant Vs. Hindustan Paper Corporation Ltd. ...Respondent For Appellant: Mr. Nishant Kumar, Mr. Animesh Kumar, Ms. Shweta Singh, Mr. Rishabh Gupta, Advocates. For Respondent: Mr. Rahul Sharma, Advocate for Liquidator
ORDER
(Through Virtual Mode)
08.03.2022: Heard Learned Counsel for the Appellant.
2. This Appeal has been filed against the order dated 22.10.2021 passed
by the Adjudicating Authority (National Company Law Tribunal), New Delhi,
Court-II, by which the Appeal filed by the Appellant under Section 42 of the
Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 ("Code" for short) has been rejected as
barred by time. Before the Liquidator, the Appellant has filed his claim for an
amount of Rs. 1,09,32,838/-. Liquidator on 19.08.2019 has communicated
that his claim to the extent of Rs. 67,78,450/- is admitted. It was also noticed
in the e-mail that as per the confirmation from the Corporate Debtor, the
payable amount is only Rs. 66,42,796/-. After the aforesaid order, the list of
stakeholders was uploaded on 21.07.2020. The Appellant filed an Appeal
under Section 42 of the Code on 20.09.2021. The Appeal came to be dismissed
by the Adjudicating Authority on the ground that the Appeal ought to have 2
been filed within 14 days as per Section 42 and Appeal is beyond time and is
rejected.
3. Learned Counsel for the Appellant submits that in the Memorandum of
Appeal, which he has filed, he has referred to both the orders dated
19.08.2019 and 21.07.2020 when the list of stakeholders was uploaded. He
further submits that the communication of the Liquidator was not final since
he has communicated that the Corporate Debtor has intimated that his
amount is Rs. 66,42,796/-. He submits that due to the above, his Appeal is
not barred by time. He has placed reliance on the judgment of the Hon'ble
Supreme Court in Suo Moto Writ Petition (Civil) No. 03 of 2020.
4. We have considered the submissions of the Learned Counsel for the
Appellant and perused the record.
5. The communication which was made by the Liquidator on 19.08.2019
in response to the claim of the Appellant is as follows:-
"Dear Sir,
We are in receipt of your letter dated 08.08.2019 regarding admission of claim amount of Rs. 1,09,32,838/-. Accordingly clarification has been sought from the officials of Corporate Debtor for the same. In this regard the official of corporate debtor is replied in the below trailing mail. Further adding that the official of the corporate debtor is also provided certain copies of clarification for confirmation of claim
Comp. App. (AT) (Insolvency) No. 152 of 2022 3
in the separate mail. The copies of the same is also attached for your ready reference.
In the stakeholder list uploaded in the website of Hindustan Paper Corporation Limited we have admitted an amount of Rs. 67,78,450/-. However as per the confirmation from the Corporate Debtor the payable amount to the party is Rs.66,42,796/-. The same will be rectified and upload in the next updated stakeholders list. Also request you to please go through the documents provided to us by corporate debtor which have been shared with you and let us know in case you require any clarification in this regard. The same were also shared by officials of corporate debtor with you."
6. The Liquidator has, thus, clearly indicated that he has admitted his
claim of only Rs.67,78,450/-. The cause of action arose to the Applicant to
question the said order since part of claim was rejected. The mere fact that the
list of stakeholders was uploaded on 21.07.2020 did not gave any cause of
action since what was uploaded was the same claim which was admitted by
the Liquidator amounting to Rs.67,78,450/- along with other details.
7. We are of the view that the Adjudicating Authority has rightly held that
the Appeal was barred by time. Appellant cannot claim any limitation from
21.07.2020 since his claim stood partly rejected on 19.08.2019. Insofar as the
submission of the Counsel for the Appellant that the communication of the
Liquidator was not final, suffice it to say that only query raised was that
confirmation from the Corporate Debtor is an amount of Rs. 66,42,796/-
Comp. App. (AT) (Insolvency) No. 152 of 2022 4
which was a lessor amount to which claim was admitted. In the final list, the
amount admitted is the same i.e. Rs.67,78,450/-, hence, the order of the
liquidation in no manner has been modified. We, thus, are of the view that no
error has been committed by the Adjudicating Authority rejecting the
Application being barred by time. There is no merit in the Appeal. The Appeal
is dismissed. It is further to be noticed that the judgment of the Hon'ble
Supreme Court in Suo Moto Writ Petition (Civil) No. 03 of 2020 shall not come
to the aid of the Appellant since his limitation expired much before
15.03.2020.
[Justice Ashok Bhushan] Chairperson
[Dr. Alok Srivastava] Member (Technical) Anjali/nn
Comp. App. (AT) (Insolvency) No. 152 of 2022
This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.
Research this judgment with Miss Lucy
Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.
Try Miss Lucy free