Sapan Mohan Garg vs Manish G. Patel & Anr
- CitationCompany Appeal (AT) (Ins) No. 837 of 2021
Ratio decidendi
The rule this decision rests on
The Adjudicating Authority cannot entertain an application by a Resolution Professional seeking to initiate prosecution under Section 70 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, because the Resolution Professional is not empowered to launch such prosecution; a complaint under Section 70 must be filed by the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India, the Central Government, or a person authorised by the Central Government.
Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.
Judgment
As delivered
IN THE MATTER OF: Sapan Mohan Garg Resolution Professional of Sort India Enviro Solutions Ltd. ...Appellant Versus
Manish G Patel & Anr. ...Respondents Present:
For Appellant : Mr. Milan Singh Negi and Mr. Niwhil Kuamr Jha, Advocates. For Respondents : None
ORDER
09.09.2022: This Appeal is directed against the order dated 06.09.2021
passed by the Adjudicating Authority (National Company Law Tribunal,
Ahmedabad) Court-2, by which an application bearing I.A. No.577 of 2021 filed
by the Appellant (RP) invoking Section 70 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy
Code, 2016 (for short 'Code') was dismissed only on the ground that the
Tribunal lacks jurisdiction to entertain such an application. Counsel for the
Appellant, during the course of hearing, has referred to a decision of this
Tribunal passed in CA (AT) (Ins) No. 169 of 2022, in the matter of 'Vivek
Prakash (Suspended Director & MD) vs. Dinesh Kr. Gupta, Liquidator of M/s
Jarvis Infratech Pvt. Ltd. & Anr.' dated 21.02.2022, passed by National
Company Law Appellate Tribunal in which it has been held that the RP is not
empowered to initiate the prosecution but at the same time, it has been held
that in order to initiate prosecution under Section 70 the complaint has to be -2-
filed by the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI) or Central
Government or person authorized by the Central Government.
In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances, we do not find any error
in the order of the Ld. Tribunal, therefore, the present Appeal is hereby
dismissed. However, liberty is granted to the RP to file an appropriate
application to the IBBI in this regard, if so advised.
[Justice Rakesh Kumar Jain] Member (Judicial)
[Ms. Shreesha Merla] Member (Technical)
sr/kam
Company Appeal (AT) (Ins) No. 837 of 2021
This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.
Research this judgment with Miss Lucy
Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.
Try Miss Lucy free