Miss Lucy
← All judgments

Sanjay Kumar Dewani Interim Resolution ... vs Na

National Company Law Appellate Tribunal12 April 2021

Interim / procedural order — not a final adjudication. Do not cite as a holding.

Ratio decidendi

The rule this decision rests on

The period during which the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process was stayed or could not proceed on account of the lockdown, as already excluded by an earlier order of the Adjudicating Authority, is excluded from the calculation of the CIRP period under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, and the Adjudicating Authority may likewise exclude further time consumed in adjudicating the application seeking such exclusion together with the time taken in the appellate process, where the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process was rendered incapable of completion within the statutory period by the pendency of that application.

Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.

Judgment

As delivered

NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNALNEW DELHI, PRINCIPAL BENCHCompany Appeal (AT) (Ins.) No. 306 of 2021

In the matter of: Sanjay Kumar Dewani Interim Resolution Professional of ADI Automotives Pvt. Ltd. ....Appellant

Present For Appellant: Mr. Milan Singh Negi, Advocate.

ORDER

(Virtual Mode)

12.04.2021: In Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 306 of 2021 filed on

behalf of the Appellant 'Sanjay Kumar Dewani, Interim Resolution Professional

of ADI Automotives Pvt. Ltd.' being satisfied by the Order dated 15.03.2021 in

CP (IB) No. 259/CHD/HRY/2019 whereby the Learned NCLT, Chandigarh

Bench allowed the I.A. Application No. 33 of 2021 to the limited extent of

excluding the periods from 03.09.2020 to 14.12.2020 from the Corporate

Insolvency Resolution Process period and disposed of the I.A.

2. This recent Appeal was filed before this Court on 05.04.2021 and taken

up for Admission today.

3. Learned Counsel for the Appellant referred to Annexure A-4 at Page 52,

which is the Order of the Learned Tribunal passed in I.A. Application No. 503

of 2020. Para 4 is reproduced as hereunder;

"4. In the circumstances, the instant IA No. 503/2020 is allowed to the limited extent of excluding the period of lockdown w.e.f. 25.03.2020 to 31.07.2020 and also with a liberty as aforesaid.

-2-

4. Learned Counsel for the Appellant submitted that pursuant to the Order

they have filed the said I.A. Application bearing No. 33 of 2021 on 07.01.2021,

in which the prayer was made that;

"In view of the foregoing, it is humbly prayed that this Hon'ble Adjudicating Authority may be pleased to:

(a) Allow the present application excluding the time period of 103 days utilized during the pendency of I.A. No. 503 of 2020 form the total time period of the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process of the Corporate Debtor calculated from 03.09.2020 to 14.12.2020; and

(b) Exclude the time period as may be required for adjudication of the present application, i.e. from 14.12.2020 till the actual date of disposal of the instant application, from the total time period of the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process of the Corporate Debtor;

(c) Pass such other/further order(s) of this Hon'ble Adjudicating Authority may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the present case."

5. Learned Counsel for the Appellant while referring to the Impugned Order

submitted that only period from 03.09.2021 to 14.12.2020 has been excluded.

Being aggrieved, they have filed this Application.

6. Counsel for the Appellant further submitted that he has filed an

'Additional Affidavit' in I.A. Application No. 33 of 2021 on 05.03.2021, wherein

in Para 4 they have arrayed the complete details, which is reproduced as

hereunder;

"In compliance of the above direction of this Hon'ble Tribunal, the Applicant herein is filing the present affidavit, hence placing on record the following important list of dates and events thereon:

Company Appeal (AT) (Ins.) No. 306 of 2021 -3-

Date Events Particulars 08.01.2020 CIRP in the present case was This Hon'ble Tribunal was commenced on the order of pleased to admit the this Hon'ble Tribunal. application filed under section 9 of IBC 06.07.2020 The time-period of 180 days On expiry of the time-

(as provided under Section period, the CoC became 12(1) of IBC) expired. functus officio and the meeting of the CoC could not be held.

03.09.2020 The Applicant/IRP filed IA 10.02.2020-24.03.2020 (44 503/2020 for exclusion of days) 192 days from the CIRP 25.03.2020-20.08.2020 time-period. (148 days) Total: 192 days. 14.12.2020 IA 503/2020 was partly Liberty was also granted to allowed by granting the IRP to file application, exclusion of 129 days "seeking exclusion of any (25.03.2020 to 31.07.2020). other period if necessary". 12.11.2020 On applying the above Being so, the CoC could not exclusion of 129 days to the be held for having become present case, it was functus officio. observed that the time- IRP was advised to file period of 180 days held appropriate application, as already expired on per the liberty so granted. 13.11.2020. 07.01.2021 The present application (IA The application was listed 33/2021) was filed for on 11.01.2021 & exclusion of 188 days. 20.01.2021; however, the same could not be taken up due to strike called by the Bar Association.

7. It was submitted that the period from 07.01.2021 till 15.03.2021 the

period on which the Learned NCLT passed the Impugned Order be also

excluded. This comes to 66 days. He, further, submitted that period of 7 days

spent in pursuant of this Appeal total 73 days be excluded.

8. Impugned Order dated 15.03.2021 is modified to the extent that further

period of 66 days i.e. from 07.01.2021 to 15.03.2021 and further from

Company Appeal (AT) (Ins.) No. 306 of 2021 -4-

05.04.2021 when the instant Appeal was filed before this Tribunal on

12.04.2021 total (66+7=73) days further excluded from the CIRP period.

9. The Appeal after modification of the Impugned Order dated 15.03.2021,

is allowed to the limited extent as indicated above.

[Justice Anant Bijay Singh] Member (Judicial)

[Ms. Shreesha Merla] Member (Technical) ha/nn

Company Appeal (AT) (Ins.) No. 306 of 2021

This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.

Research this judgment with Miss Lucy

Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.

Try Miss Lucy free