Miss Lucy
← All judgments

Sai Abacus Education System Pvt Ltd vs Registrar Of Companies New Delhi

National Company Law Appellate Tribunal27 July 2020

Ratio decidendi

The rule this decision rests on

Where a company's default in filing annual returns has led to penal costs being imposed on it, the quantum of costs must be proportionate to the default and to the company's circumstances, and the Tribunal may reduce costs that are disproportionate by setting aside the component directed to a particular payee while retaining the component directed to another.

Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.

Judgment

As delivered

NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHICompany Appeal (AT) No.111 of 2020IN THE MATTER OF:

M/s Sai Abacus Education System Pvt. Ltd. ...Appellant Versus Registrar of Companies, New Delhi ...Respondent

Present:

For Appellant: Ms. Sujatha Shirolkar, Advocate For Respondent: Mr. Kamalkant Jha and Mr. Santhosh Kumar, (RoC)

OR D E R (Virtual Mode)

27.07.2020 Heard the Learned Counsel for the Appellant. The Learned

Counsel for the Appellant says that the Appellant had filed Returns but only

Balance-sheet for one year was yet to be filed and the name of the Company came

to be struck off. The Impugned Order says that 'RoC' had initiated action for non-

filing of Annual Returns for the years 2015-2016 and 2016-2017. The Ld. NCLT

has granted relief to the Appellant subject to payment of costs of Rs. 25,000/-in the

Prime Minister Relief Fund along with Rs. 50,000/- in the Ministry of Corporate

Affairs.

The Learned Counsel for the Appellant states that the Appellant is in the

profession of Education and has been suffering losses and thus the costs should

not have been imposed.

-2-

Respondent is 'RoC'. We dispense with Notice to 'RoC' matter being only of

costs.

Considering the default and the order passed, it appears to us that it will be

appropriate considering proportionality to reduce the costs to payment of Rs.

25,000/- in the Prime Minister Relief Fund and we set aside the direction of the Ld.

NCLT to pay another Rs. 50,000/- to the Ministry of Corporate Affairs.

With this modification in Impugned Order, the Appeal stands disposed of.

[Justice A.I.S. Cheema] Member (Judicial)

[Justice Venugopal M.] Member (Judicial)

[Kanthi Narahari) Member (Technical)

Basant B./ md/

Company Appeal (AT) No.111 of 2020

This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.

Research this judgment with Miss Lucy

Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.

Try Miss Lucy free