Rushabh Precision Bearings Limited vs Shimnit India Private Limited
- CitationCompany Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 536 of 2022
Ratio decidendi
The rule this decision rests on
Where a financial creditor's loan agreement provides that failure to pay interest for two consecutive quarters triggers an event of default, and interest on an additional loan carries no moratorium, a default on that additional loan occurs upon the expiry of two consecutive unpaid quarters, entitling the financial creditor to file an application under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, irrespective of whether any default on the principal loan, subject to a moratorium, had yet occurred. A borrower who has acknowledged receipt of the loan amount and, by an affidavit of undertaking, admitted the liability in the sum claimed cannot be permitted to contend that no default has occurred in the payment of the loan.
Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.
Judgment
As delivered
[Arising out of Order dated 25.04.2022 passed by the Adjudicating Authority (National Company Law Tribunal), Mumbai Bench, Court III, Special Bench in C.P. (IB)-70(MB)/2022]
IN THE MATTER OF:
Rajesh Vora, Promoter/ Director of Rushabh Precision Bearings Limited Registered Office 404 Floor 4, Plot 6 - 208 Regent Chambers Jamnalal Bajaj Marg Nariman Point Mumbai - 400 021. ...Appellant
Versus
Shimnit India Pvt. Ltd. Registered Office 8th Floor, Regent Chambers Nariman Point Mumbai - 400 021. ...Respondent
Present: For Appellant: Mr. Abhijeet Sinha, Mr. Susheel Cyrial, Mr. Nirnimesh Dube, Mr. Ankur S. Kulkarni, Advocates. For Respondents: Mr. Amanpreet Singh Rahi, Advocate.
JUDGMENT
ASHOK BHUSHAN, J.
This Appeal by a suspended Director of the Corporate Debtor has
been filed against the order dated 25.04.2022 passed by the Adjudicating
Authority (National Company Law Tribunal), Mumbai Bench, Court III,
Cont'd.../ -2-
Special Bench by which order application filed by the Respondent - 'M/s
Shimnit India Pvt. Ltd.' under Section 7 has been admitted. The brief facts
of the case necessary to be noticed for deciding this Appeal are:
(a) A loan agreement dated 28.05.2021 was entered between the
Financial Creditor and the Corporate Debtor noticing that lender has
advanced an amount of Rs.6,35,24,668/- to the Borrower carrying
interest @ 18% p.a., as stipulated in Schedule-1. Lender also agreed
to advance additional sum of Rs.11 Crores to the Borrower in the
manner as stipulated in Schedule-2. The loan agreement contained
Schedule-I and II that dealt with principal loan and additional loan,
terms and conditions for repayment, the moratorium and events of
default.
(b) The Corporate Debtor defaulted to make the payment.
(c) Application under Section 7 was filed by the Financial Creditor in
January, 2022 mentioning the date of default as 27.11.2021 and
total debt as Rs.22,23,45,748/-. Notice was issued in Section 7
application. The Adjudicating Authority heard the Financial Creditor
and the Corporate Debtor and by the impugned order admitted the
application holding that debt and default is proved.
(d) The Suspended Director of the Corporate Debtor has filed this Appeal
challenging the order dated 25.04.2022.
Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 536 of 2022 -3-
2. We have heard Shri Abhijeet Sinha, learned counsel for the Appellant
and Shri Amanpreet Singh Rahi, learned counsel appearing for the
Respondent.
3. On 02.06.2022, noticing the submission of learned counsel for the
Appellant, this Court passed following order:-
"ORDER (Virtual Mode)
02.06.2022: Shri Abhijeet Sinha, Learned Counsel for the Appellant submits that the entire amount as claimed in Section 7 Application is Rs.22,23,45,748/- which includes interest as on 31/12/2021.
2. He submits that the aforesaid amount alongwith upto date interest shall be paid to the Appellant provided that the Appellant is given time till 01st week of July.
3. He submits that the Appellant undertake to pay the said payment. He has also received the Letter of Comfort for payment of the said amount.
4. In view of the aforesaid, we adjourn this Appeal and direct the Appeal to be listed on 07th July, 2022.
5. In the meantime, in pursuance of the Impugned Order, CoC shall not be constituted. However, IRP shall continue the 'Corporate Debtor' as a 'Going Concern'.
6. Learned Counsel for the Appellant submits that he shall be permitted to file undertaking by
Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 536 of 2022 -4-
tomorrow. Prayer allowed. He may file the same by tomorrow.
List this Appeal on 07th July, 2022."
4. When the Appeal was taken on 07.07.2022, learned counsel for the
Appellant fairly submitted that amount has not yet been paid.
Consequently, the interim order passed by this Tribunal was withdrawn.
5. Shri Abhijeet Sinha, learned counsel for the Appellant challenging
the impugned order contends that event of default has not occurred in
January, 2022 when the Financial Creditor filed Section 7 application. It
is submitted that moratorium period on repayment of interest came to end
on 27.11.2021 and thereafter only after failure of payment of interest for
two consecutive quarters application under Section 7 could have been filed.
It is submitted that no application could have been filed till 28.05.2022
since default, if any, can occur on 28.05.2022. It is submitted that insofar
as Additional Loan of Rs.11 Crores is concerned, the same after being
received by the Corporate Debtor was paid back to sister concern of the
Corporate Debtor, hence, there is no liability with regard to Additional Loan
of Rs.11 Crores.
6. Shri Amanpreet Singh Rahi, learned counsel for the Respondent
refuting the submission of learned counsel for the Appellant submits that
Appellant has committed default in repayment of Principal Loan as well as
Additional Loan, hence, Section 7 application was rightly filed and admitted
by the Adjudicating Authority. It is submitted that the submission of the
Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 536 of 2022 -5-
Appellant that Additional Loan of Rs.11 Crores was immediately
transferred to Sister Concern of the Corporate Debtor hence there is no
liability to repay the same is wholly erroneous. It is submitted that amount
of Rs.11 Crores - Additional Loan was received by the Corporate Debtor
from 10.06.201 to 18.06.2021 in eleven equal amounts in its bank account.
Thereafter, this was transferred to personal accounts of Mr. Rajesh D.
Vohra, who further paid his debt owed to M/s Bravo Builders Pvt. Ltd.
Receipt of Rs.11 Crores is an admitted fact and this submission that there
is no liability to repay Additional Loan is misleading and incorrect. Learned
counsel submitted that interpretation of the Event of Default is not
correctly done by the Appellant. The moratorium came to an end on
27.11.2021, hence, interest of two quarters immediately became due which
was to be paid on 28.11.2021. It is submitted that Appellant has filed an
affidavit dated 02.06.2022 in this Tribunal where he undertook to make
entire payment of Rs.22,23,45,748/-, hence, Appellant cannot be heard to
say that no amount was payable by the Appellant. Appellant is bound by
its undertaking. The Appeal deserves to be dismissed only on the ground
of Affidavit of Undertaking filed by the Appellant.
7. We have considered submissions of learned counsel for the parties
and perused the record.
8. Part IV of the Section 7 application refers to three amount of loan
namely Principal Loan, Additional Loan and Further Loan. Following are
the details given in Section 7 application:-
Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 536 of 2022 -6-
PARTICULARS OF FINANCIAL DEBT
Sr. Particulars Amount (in No. Rs.) Principal Loan
1. Principal 6,35,74,028/-
Amount
2. Interest (at 91,34,876/-
the rate of 18% PA) Amount Total (A) 7,27,08,904/-
Additional Loan
1. Principal 11,00,00,000/-
Amount
2. Interest (at 1,08,59,178/-
the rate of 18% PA) Amount Total (B) 12,08,59,178/- Further Loan 1. Principal 2,65,00,000/- Amount 2. Interest (at 22,77,666/- the rate of 18% PA) Amount Total (C) 2,87,77,666/- Grand Total 22,23,45,748/- (A+B+C)
Date of Default:
27.11.2021 (Six months from the date of the Loan Agreement dated 28.05.2021)
9. The Loan Agreement dated 28.05.2021 has been brought on the
record which refers to Principal Loan as well as Additional Loan. Para 4A
of the Loan Agreement is as follows:-
Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 536 of 2022 -7-
"4. REPAYMENT OF THE LOAN AMOUNT-
(a) The Borrower may repay all or any portion of the Principal Loan and Additional Loan at any time or from time to time, provided that repayment of full Principal Loan and Additional Loan along with the applicable interest shall be repaid by the Borrower on or before the 'Maturity Date' as stipulated in SCHEDULES 1 and 2 hereunder. The Maturity Date of loans may be extended as mutually agreed between the Parties in writing."
10. The Loan Agreement contains two schedules - Schedule-1 and
Schedule-2, which are to the following effect:-
"SCHEDULE-1 (Principal Loan)
A. The Lender has in terms of the following schedule already disbursed payments amounting to Rs.6,35,74,668/- which shall bear interest @ 18% per annum from the date of disbursement:
Sr. Date of Particulars Amount in Ch No. / Purpose No. Payment Rs. UTR No.
1. 11.01.2021 National 7,10,640 CMS176 Towards Stock 4297833 listing fees Exchange of India A/c RPBL
2. 16.03.2021 Rushabh 3,87,46,714 2053 Repayment Precision of Loan Bearings from Kotak Ltd. Bank
3. 16.03.2021 Rushabh 2,25,39,513 2041 Repayment Precision of Loan Bearings from Kotak Ltd. Bank
Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 536 of 2022 -8-
4. 26.03.2021 Rushabh 3,36,635 CMS187 Repayment Precision 7757246 of Loan Bearings from Kotak Ltd. Bank
5. 31.03.2021 National 12,41,166 CMS188 Towards Stock 4884248 listing fees Exchange of India A/c RPBL Total 6,35,74,668
B. The tenure of the Principal Loan shall be three years.
C. There shall be a 6 month moratorium period for repayment of interest from the date of execution of this Agreement. The interest shall be applicable and levied from the date of disbursement of the Principal Loan amount.
The interest accrued for the first 6 months shall be paid immediately upon the expiration of the moratorium.
D. The interest on the Principal Loan shall be payable on last day of every quarter and shall be calculated on the basis of 365 days to a year on reducing balance. The interest shall be payable quarterly from the date of first disbursement.
E. That any failure to make payment towards the interest against the Principal Loan amount for 2(two) consecutive quarters (i.e. 6 months) shall trigger an event of default in terms of clause 8 hereinabove."
"SCHEDULE-2 (Additional Loan)
A. The Lender shall upon compliance of condition precedent for the Additional Loan (in
Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 536 of 2022 -9-
accordance with clause 6), in terms of the following schedule disburse payments amounting to Rs.11,00,00,000/- which shall bear interest @ 18% per annum.
B. The tenure of the Additional Loan shall be one year.
C. The interest shall be applicable and levied from the date of disbursement of the Additional Loan amount.
D. The interest on the Additional Loan shall be payable on last day of every month and shall be calculated on the basis of 365 days to a year on reducing balance. The interest shall be payable quarterly from the date of first disbursement.
E. That any failure to make payment towards the interest against the Additional Loan amount for 2 (two) consecutive quarters (i.e. 6 months) shall trigger an event of default in terms of clause 8 hereinabove."
11. The submission of Shri Sinha is that when Clause (C) and Clause (E)
of Schedule-1 are read together it is clear that after expiry of moratorium
when interest against Principal Loan is in default for two consecutive
quarters, the event of default shall occur. Reply of the Respondent is that
the interest was payable from the date of disbursement of Principal Loan
amount and it became due every month but due to moratorium became
payable on 27.11.2022. The interest remained in default for two
consecutive quarters i.e from 28.05.2021 to 27.11.2021. Learned counsel
for the Respondent further submitted that Schedule-2 which dealt with
Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 536 of 2022 -10-
Additional Loan of Rs.11 Crores did not contain any moratorium and the
interest was payable quarterly from the date of first disbursement and on
failure to make payment towards interest for two consecutive quarters
default was to trigger. It is submitted that disbursement of Additional Loan
of Rs.11 Crores is admitted fact and there being no moratorium in
Schedule-2, two consecutive quarters were expired on 27.11.2021 making
the loan due.
12. With regard to Additional Loan, the submission of learned counsel
for the Appellant is that the said amount after receipt was transferred to
the Sister Concern of the Corporate Debtor. The bank statement of the
Corporate Debtor has been brought on record which indicate that amount
of Rs.11 Crores was received in 11 instalments of Rs.1 Crore each which
amount was transferred in the personal account of the Appellant and
thereafter to another entity M/s Bravo Builders Pvt. Ltd. Receipt of
Additional Loan of Rs.11 Crores was not even denied. As per Schedule-2,
interest of two quarters became due on 27.11.2021 and thus, in any event
default was committed with regard to Additional Loan.
13. The Adjudicating Authority in the impugned order has after
considering the submissions of the parties has returned finding that
default was committed. In para 21 of the order following has been held by
the Adjudicating Authority:-
"21. The Bench also notes that any extension of period of repayment of interest is exclusively
Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 536 of 2022 -11-
the prerogative of the lender and it is at his sole discretion. Therefore, the Corporate Debtor cannot take the plea that it should have been extended by another six months from 27.11.2021. The Bench also notes that, in fact, in their additional Affidavit filed on 16.03.2022, the Corporate Debtor also acknowledges that he has received Rs.11 crore from the Financial Creditor and hence there is a clear admission of default on part of the Corporate Debtor."
14. Even if for arguments sake, the event of default had not occurred
with Principal Loan, the event of default did occur for Additional Loan and
Further Loan on 27.11.2021 giving right to the Financial Creditor to file
Section 7 application in January, 2022.
15. We, thus, are satisfied that Adjudicating Authority has rightly after
finding debt and default admitted Section 7 application. We may further
notice one more aspect of the present Appeal. On the very first day when
this Appeal came for consideration before this Appellate Tribunal, learned
counsel for the Appellant submitted that Appellant intends to settle the
entire amount of Principal and interest within a period of three months.
Further on 02.06.2022, Appellant undertook to make payment of entire
amount of Rs.22,23,45,748/-. Further, an Affidavit of Undertaking was
also filed on 02.06.2022, where in para 2 following has been stated:-
"2. I, hereby, undertake to pay the entire amount of Rs.22,23,45,748/- (Rupees Twenty Two
Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 536 of 2022 -12-
Crores Twenty Three Lakhs Forty Five Thousand Seven Hundred and Forty Eight) to the Respondent which includes entire amount as claimed in the instant Section 7 Application alongwith interest accrued thereupon till 31/12/2021 on or before 05/07/2022 in terms of the Order dated 02/06/2022 passed by this Hon'ble Tribunal in the instant Appeal."
16. In view of the aforesaid, the submission of the Appellant that no event
of default took place in loan cannot be accepted. Nor, Appellant can be
permitted to submit that no default took place in the payment of loan. We,
thus, are fully satisfied that the Adjudicating Authority did not commit any
error in admitting Section 7 application. There is no merit in the Appeal.
Appeal is dismissed.
[Justice Ashok Bhushan] Chairperson
[Barun Mitra] Member (Technical)
NEW DELHI
24th August, 2022
Archana
Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 536 of 2022
This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.
Research this judgment with Miss Lucy
Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.
Try Miss Lucy free