Roselabs Finance Ltd. vs Sebi
- CitationAppeal No.101 of 2020
Ratio decidendi
The rule this decision rests on
The Tribunal may condition the hearing of an appeal against a monetary penalty on the appellant's deposit of part of the penalty amount, and where the respondent has not filed its reply despite the time granted, the Tribunal may require that deposit as an interim measure, directing that the deposited sum be held in an interest-bearing account subject to the outcome of the appeal, with recovery of the balance and any attachment suspended during the appeal's pendency.
Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.
Judgment
As delivered
Justice Tarun Agarwala Presiding Officer TARUN Digitally signed by TARUN AGARWAL DN: c=IN, o=PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT UTTAR PRADESH, postalCode=221505, st=Uttar Pradesh, 2.5.4.20=30fcf68685192bbc53e6ff1608a83fb3881de7ac2ab7
AGARWAL 954d509c85ed6e0f7c41, serialNumber=095f8b286bb0b1cd07ff676611f4f5e7999727d 404aa38ca422f9d3529bdb8a3, cn=TARUN AGARWAL Date: 2020.11.10 15:00:22 +05'30'
Dr. C. K. G. Nair Member
Justice M.T. Joshi Judicial Member
10.11.2020 RHN
This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.
Research this judgment with Miss Lucy
Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.
Try Miss Lucy free