Miss Lucy
← All judgments

Religare Finvest Ltd vs Nippon Investment & Finance Co. Pvt. ...

National Company Law Appellate Tribunal27 February 2020

Ratio decidendi

The rule this decision rests on

Under Section 61 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, an appeal must be filed within thirty days of the impugned order, and the Appellate Tribunal's power to condone delay extends only to a further fifteen days beyond that period; where the delay exceeds that fifteen-day extension, the Tribunal has no power to condone it and the appeal must be dismissed as time-barred.

Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.

Judgment

As delivered

NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI IA 899/2020 with Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency)No. 339 of 2020 IN THE MATTER OF: Religare Finvest Ltd. .....Appellant Vs. Nippon Investment & Finance Co. Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. ......Respondents Present : For Appellant: Ms. Tannya Baranwal, Advocate

O R D E R

27.02.2020 - This appeal has been filed by the Minority Financial Creditor

who was part of 'Committee of Creditors' (COC) having 4.04% voting right. The

appeal has been filed against the Impugned Order dated 05.12.19 by which order

the 'Resolution Plan' approved by the 'Committee of Creditors' by requisite

majority has been accepted, by the Adjudicating Authority.

The Application IA No. 899/2020 has been filed by the Appellant to

condone 29 days of delay in filing of the appeal. The Impugned Order is dated

05.12.2019 and the appeal has been filed after 74 days on 18.12.2020. The

reason given for delay is that there was some typing error in the Impugned Order

for which the Appellant filed an application to the Adjudicating Authority, but

the Adjudicating Authority has not passed any order and that the certified copy

of the order was availed only on 13.02.2020.

.....contd.

2

Under Section 61 of the Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code, 2016 ('I&B' Code,

for short), the delay after period of Appeal of 30 days which this Tribunal can

condone is another 15 days' period.

As there is delay of more than 15 days, IA 899/2020 is rejected.

Consequently, the appeal cannot be entertained and the same stands disposed

of as time barred.

[Justice A.I.S. Cheema] Member (Judicial)

[Justice Anant Bijay Singh] Member (Judicial)

[Kanthi Narahari] Member (Technical)

ss/m

Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency)No. 339 of 2020

This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.

Research this judgment with Miss Lucy

Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.

Try Miss Lucy free