Reliance Industries Limited vs Sebi
- CitationAppeal No. 306 of 2014
Ratio decidendi
The rule this decision rests on
The computation of diluted earnings per share must follow the requirements of AS-20; where the adjudicating authority has included in the DEPS computation all the shares relatable to warrants without regard to those requirements, the computation is not in accordance with AS-20, and an order founded on that computation cannot stand.
Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.
Judgment
As delivered
BEFORE THE SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI Date of Decision: 16.12.2015
Appeal No. 306 of 2014
Reliance Industries Limited 3rd Floor, Maker Chamber IV, 222, Nariman Point, Mumbai- 400 021 ...Appellant
Versus
Securities and Exchange Board of India, SEBI Bhavan, Plot No. C-4A, G-Block, Bandra-Kurla Complex, Bandra (East), Mumbai -400 051 ...Respondent
Mr. Janak Dwarkadas, Senior Advocate with Mr. Rohan Rajadhyaksha, Mr. Rajendra Barot and Mr. Divij Kishore, Advocates i/b AZB & Partners, for the Appellant.
Mr. Shiraz Rustomjee, Senior Advocate with Mr. Mihir Mody and Ms. Shruti Chiniwar, Advocates i/b K. Ashar & Co. for the Respondent.
CORAM: Justice J.P. Devadhar, Presiding Officer Jog Singh, Member
Per: Justice J.P. Devadhar (Oral)
1.
Appellant is aggrieved by the adjudication order passed by the
Adjudicating Officer of Securities and Exchange Board of India ("SEBI"
for short) on 08.08.2014. By that order penalty of ` 1 crore is imposed
on the appellant for allegedly violating Section 23A(a) of the Securities
Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1956 and penalty of ` 12 crore is imposed
on the appellant for allegedly violating Section 23E of the Securities
Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1956.
2. One of the major ground taken in the appeal is that in paragraph 29
of the impugned order, the Adjudicating Officer has taken into account 2
all the 12 crore shares relatable to the warrants in question while
computing the Diluted Earnings Per Share (DEPS) for the 6 quarters in
question. This factual position is not disputed by SEBI. In view of the
language of AS-20, taking into account all the 12 crore shares relatable to
the warrants in question while computing the DEPS does not appear to be
correct.
3. Since computation of DEPS itself is not in consonance with
AS-20, we set aside the impugned order and remand the matter of a de
novo consideration, leaving all contentions of the parties open. It would
be open to SEBI to issue supplementary show cause notice, if any, within
a period of 8 weeks from today as requested by counsel for SEBI.
4. Appeal is disposed of in the above terms with no order as to costs.
Sd/-
Justice J.P. Devadhar Presiding Officer
Sd/-
Jog Singh Member 16.12.2015 Prepared & Compared By: PK
This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.
Research this judgment with Miss Lucy
Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.
Try Miss Lucy free