Regional Provident Commissioner-I, ... vs G. Gunasekaran & Ors
- CitationCompany Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 311 of 2019
Ratio decidendi
The rule this decision rests on
The question of which authority is entitled to the sum of Rs. 75,23,608.40, deposited with the Regional Provident Commissioner-I, Tirunelveli, is left to be decided by the Adjudicating Authority (National Company Law Tribunal), Chennai, after hearing the Appellant, the Regional Provident Commissioner, the Respondents including the Employees State Insurance Corporation, and other creditors, and that determination is to be made independently of this order and without being bound by any view expressed here.
Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.
Judgment
As delivered
Regional Provident Commissioner - I, Tirunelveli ...Appellant
Versus
G. Gunasekaran & Ors. ...Respondents
Present: For Appellant : Mr. Manish Dhir, Advocate
For 1st Respondent: Mr. Ravi Raghunath, Advocate & Mr. G. Gunasekaran, Liquidator
ORDER
05.09.2019 Learned counsel for the Respondent - 'Mr. G. Gunasekaran'
submits that the entire amount of Rs. 75,23,608.40 has been deposited with the
'Regional Provident Commissioner-I', Tirunelveli on 28th August, 2019. Learned
counsel for the Appellant accepted the same. Respondent may file compliance
report in the course of the day.
In view of the aforesaid position no further order is required to be passed
except to say that the Adjudicating Authority will decide as to which authority is
eligible to receive the amount of Rs. 75,23,608.40, which is now kept in the
custody of the 'Regional Provident Commissioner-I', Tirunelveli for the present.
Hence the matter is remitted to the Adjudicating Authority (National
Company Law Tribunal), Chennai to give hearing to the Appellant; the 'Regional
Provident Commissioner-I', Tirunelveli; Respondents including 'Employees State
Insurance Corporation' and other creditors and decide as to which
- 2-
Authority/creditor is entitled for the said amount uninfluenced by order passed
by the Adjudicating Authority or this Appellate Tribunal. It will be also open to
the aggrieved person to move against such order in appeal.
The appeal stands disposed of. No costs.
[Justice S.J. Mukhopadhaya] Chairperson
[ Justice A.I.S. Cheema ] Member (Judicial)
[ Kanthi Narahari ] Member (Technical) /ns/gc
Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 311 of 2019
This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.
Research this judgment with Miss Lucy
Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.
Try Miss Lucy free