Red Bloom Investment Ltd, Mauritius — Combination C-2017/06/515
- Case No.C-2017/06/515
Ratio decidendi
The rule this decision rests on
The Commission approves a combination under s.31(1) where, on the notice filed and the factors listed in s.20(4), it is of the opinion that the combination is not likely to have an appreciable adverse effect on competition in India. Where the notice shows no horizontal overlap between the parties and no other portfolio company of the acquirer engaged in the same business, the absence of horizontal concern is a sufficient basis for that opinion. A potential vertical relationship arising from an acquirer's portfolio company acting as a corporate agent for insurance products does not raise a competition concern where a large number of other entities provide similar services, so the potential relationship does not preclude approval. An approval under s.31(1) stands revoked if the information furnished by the acquirer is found to be incorrect.
Written by Miss Lucy from the judgment below, not taken from a headnote.
Judgment
As delivered
Notice under Section 6 (2) of the Competition Act, 2002 given by Red Bloom Investments Limited.
CORAM:
Mr.Devender Kumar Sikri Chairperson Mr. S.L.Bunker Member Mr. Sudhir Mital Member
Mr. Augustine Peter Member Mr. U.C. Nahta Member
Mr. G.P. Mittal Member
Legal Representative: Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas
Order under Section 31(1) of the Competition Act, 2002 1. On 7th June, 2017, the Competition Commission of India (hereinafter referred to as the “Commission”) received a notice given by Red Bloom Investment Limited (“Red Bloom”) regarding acquisition of 9% stake by Red Bloom in ICICI Lombard General Insurance Company (“ICICI Lombard”) from FAL Corporation (“FAL”). (Hereinafter, Red Bloom and ICICI Lombard are collectively referred to as “Parties”). The notice was filed in pursuance of Share Purchase Agreement and Letter Agreement, each executed on 27th May, 2017.
COMPETITION COMMISSION OF INDIA For Greater Good
2. Apart from acquiring the stake, Red Bloom shall also acquire affirmative rights and the right to nominate one non-executive director on the Board of Directors of ICICI Lombard. The proposed combination has been filed under sub-section (2) of Section 6 read with sub-section (a) of Section 5 of the Competition Act, 2002. (“Act”). 3. Red Bloom, an investment holding company incorporated in Mauritius, is inter-alia, engaged in the business of holding long term investments. Its shareholders are private equity funds managed by Warburg Pincus LLC (“WP”). Currently, Red Bloom does not have any investments in India. 4. ICICI Lombard, a public company incorporated in India is a joint venture between ICICI Bank Limited and FFHL. It is licensed by Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority of India and is inter-alia, engaged in the business of general insurance and related products such as motor insurance, health insurance, home insurance. 5. It is stated in the notice that there is no horizontal overlap between the Parties. Further, none of the other portfolio companies of WP are engaged in the general insurance business in India. 6. It is observed that one of the portfolio companies of WP is registered as corporate agent for distributing insurance products; however, currently it does not act as an agent for ICICI Lombard. The potential vertical relationship, if any, would not raise any competition concern due to large number of entities providing similar services. 7. Considering the facts on record, details provided in the notice given under sub-section (2) of Section 6 of the Act and assessment of the proposed combination on the basis of factors stated in sub-section (4) of Section 20 of the Act, the Commission is of the opinion that proposed combination is not likely to have an appreciable adverse effect on competition in India and therefore, the Commission, hereby, approves the same under sub-section (1) of Section 31 of the Act. 8. This order shall stand revoked if, at any time, the information provided by the Acquirer is found to be incorrect.
COMPETITION COMMISSION OF INDIA For Greater Good
9. The information provided by the Acquirer shall be treated as confidential in terms of and subject to provisions of Section 57 of the Act. 10. The Secretary is directed to communicate to the Acquirer accordingly.
This page reproduces a public judgment and a summary of it. It is research material, not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts.
Research this judgment with Miss Lucy
Ask what it holds, what has followed it, and what it means for your matter — in plain English, with the citations.
Try Miss Lucy free